User talk:Lil Pablo 2007

Stop
Stop making mass changes from "English" to "British". If you wish to reinstate the edits, get consensus first. Praxidicae (talk) 14:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Dude, I am specyfing more that the people know more that what country or territory of UK, OK?, For example is more common see English instead British.
 * First, I'm not a dude and second, you're going against policy and consensus. Did you bother to read the talk page for Freddie Mercury as an example? It's literally in giant bold letters: Consensus has been reached that Queen is an active group, and Mercury is considered to have been British in Nationality and Indian in ancestry. Please do not change this without first changing consensus. Do not continue mass changing ethnicity without consensus. Praxidicae (talk) 15:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, but Freddie Mercury rises on England, because I put English, just in case you are refering references
 * Freddie Mercury was not English just because he lived in England. He also lived in Germany and Switzerland. His citizenship was British, his ethnicity was Indian, he was raised in Zanzibar and India. There is no justification for changing the description from British to English. If you persist in changing it you will be blocked. ... disco spinster   talk  15:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I understood but I can change in the other pages that you reverted, I think British is from the people that live in other parts of UK?
 * Just don't. You're going against both policy and consensus. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 16:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * And you're doing it again. Don't change "British" to "English"  Acroterion   (talk)   02:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Your English language skills are not as good as you appear to believe - please stop instructing people on your interpretation of the ethnology of the British Isles.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

October 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:40, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

November 2020
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Roald Dahl. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. I would strongly encourage you to discuss this at the article's Talk page rather than reinserting the information without discussion. DonIago (talk) 17:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * This, for the third time, is not acceptable. Use the talk page or you will be reported to be blocked. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Reversiones
This is 's reply to your question: La razón ya fue explicada en cada resumen de edición, pero tus principales ediciones fueron agregar sinopsis a las películas del Universo cinematográfico de Marvel. Estas secciones resultan redudantes, debido a que ya hay una sección que detalla la trama completa, sumado a un pequeño resumen de dos líneas en la sección inicial. Sinopsis como esta en Spider-Man: Homecoming tienen oraciones con juicios de valor (versión de es.wiki) con muchas palabras que deben ser evitadas (versión de es.wiki), además de que fueron sacadas de otro sitio web sin estar entre comillas ni tener la referencia adecuada, lo que lo convierte en una violación de derechos de autor. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  16:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

British and English
Please familiarise yourself with the essay WP:UKNATIONALS. The guidance is to refer to UK nationals as British unless they have clearly associated themselves in some way with one of the four countries - England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland - for example by playing for one of their national sporting teams or being associated with one of the devolved parliaments. Thanks. (And, stop edit warring.) Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:00, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ... disco spinster   talk  16:24, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Block
But please don't block me forever I will not doing that again, I am sorry, I am begging to the other Wikipedist. --Lil Pablo 2007 (talk) 17:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see the guide to appealing blocks. -- The SandDoctor Talk 06:32, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry to all Wikipedia

 * Don't alter unblock requests. Respond separately.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * This is now a checkuser block. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 14:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

I am innocent, I promise

 * Six accounts have been blocked apart from the probable proxy IP: that's enough for an indefinite block, which can't be changed by anyone but a checkuser.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:53, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

UTRS trolling
This user was told by another admin in that UTRS was no longer available to them. They've extensively trolled UTRS, so I got more explicit in. All further requests made via UTRS should be denied unread. They have a final avenue available to them to contest the block: email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org. That said, it's hard to imagine ArbCom granting an unblock given the extensive abuse from this user. Still, I suppose WP:SO is plausible. --Yamla (talk) 15:41, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * User was evading their block in December, 2021, pushing the soonest WP:SO would be available to them to 2022-05-06. --Yamla (talk) 22:18, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * This user continued to troll UTRS in . --Yamla (talk) 21:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)