User talk:Lilaclinda

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thank you for your review of Photoshop Elements 4.0 (I take it from this report in The Seattle Times that you are Linda Knapp). Unfortunately, your new article was not written in the encyclopedic style that we would expect for a Wikipedia article. In particular, it did not have an entirely neutral point of view, was not wikified, and had no references or even external links. Good luck with further contributions - it may be more worthwhile expanding the main article at Photoshop Elements, for example. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:16, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

BTW, your version is still available in the revision history of the page; a direct link is: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Photoshop_Elements_4.0&oldid=57263143

Also, a redirect (such as the one that was applied to the Photoshop Elements 4.0 title) doesn't mean that the content at the old title is merged into the new; just that the old title should be a "see also" for the new one. As ALoan said above, the content was probably not merged due to it looking like a copyright violation. Wikipedia gets litterally hundreds of text dumps of web pages submitted every day, so we are generally very suspious of large amounts of plain text, and are likely to remove them from the current versions of articles quite quickly, unless their pedegree is clear. JesseW, the juggling janitor 18:13, 2 July 2006 (UTC)