User talk:Lildandcd93

Re: I have a source that Hoopz wins I Love Money
Hi I have absolutely no doubt that this is true. The show has been produced quite a while ago, and I'm sure that those rumors are based on leaked information. However, that's not how this encyclopaedia works. Every bit of fact needs to be verifiable by reliable sources. Verifiability is one of the five pillars this project stands on. The source you found is, as far as I can tell, anything but a reliable source – it's more a gossip blog thing, accepting and distributing anonymous information. If we'd start accepting sources like those then the amount of plain untrue information in articles would skyrocket in no time, so I'm afraid that I have to remove it again until it is confirmed by a reliable source (which almost certainly isn't going to happen until after the respective episode has aired, since the studios' press releases always come with a don't-print-before date attached). If you disagree, feel very free to come to Talk:I Love Money again to post your source there and discuss it. Thanks & Cheers, Amalthea Talk 00:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

your Talk:Khia arguement
I deleted the arguement (and the whole section) because it all focused on whether or not the subject of the article is worthy of the nickname "Queen of the South". Your opinion on a subject's worthiness to have this nickname has nothing to do with the article. If you do not believe Khia has ever refered to herself as Queen of the South, or you do not believe that a reliable source has ever mentioned her being called Queen of the South, then you should challenge the info for verification. If a reliable source can be found backing up the nickname's existance, the info may be included in the article regardless of her perceived worthiness (additionally, if reliable sources are found, info can also be added about how the nickname is disputed or how however many people do not see her as worthy of the nickname). CIGraphix (talk) 18:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Big Girls Don't Cry (Personal) -Remix feat. Sean Kingston- - Single.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Big Girls Don't Cry (Personal) -Remix feat. Sean Kingston- - Single.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KatrinaTaylor.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:KatrinaTaylor.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —  Σ xplicit  04:39, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Amazin' (Trina album)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Amazin' (Trina album). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Amazin' (Trina album). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)