User talk:Lildrummer 94

July 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Matt Stone, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 06:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Ripstik, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dlh-stablelights 09:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Gerge
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gerge, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gerge fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: This is a neologism that is not sourced To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gerge, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop disruptive editing
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to William Shakespeare, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Arch dude 03:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to William Shakespeare, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Arch dude 03:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you, you penis Euryalus (talk) 04:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Wind power has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 02:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoy gabs adds 02:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)