User talk:Lilevilbrian

please do not disregard wikipedia rules. you cannot simply delete information from an article (east asia) without even stating a reason or justification on the discussion page, or even putting into consideration the information has been agreed upon through countless collaborations including from many veteran members of wikipedia. wikipedia strives to be NPOV, and in this regard, that article has already been agreed upon. -- User:165.196.104.90

=
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fan-1967 17:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Please visit and fix it!Thanks!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Major_religious_groups#Vietnam_need_to_fix.21Quickly.21 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelo De La Paz (talk • contribs) 10:21, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:RoadRulesEurope.png
Thanks for uploading Image:RoadRulesEurope.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 01:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

The Real World: Sydney
Hi. Just so you know, all information on Wikipedia must be supported by valid, credible sources. (See Citing Sources for more on this.) Blogs, anecdotal rumors, and MySpace pages are not considered credible sources by Wikipedia. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:40, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Having just gotten the first chance to look at mtv.com's page for that episode since coming back from abroad, I see that the passage you wrote for that episode was copied verbatim by you from their site. That's copyright infringement, and is illegal, and could be grounds for being blocked in the future. Moreover, that link you provided that you labeled as the Video for Episode 20 was not.  It was the Summary Page for Episode 19, which had only a sneak preview for Episode 20.  Please do not place sources in articles if they do not support the material.  Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. It is customary to refer to TV shows and films with the present tense "is", even if they are from years past.  As a compromise, I omitted the word "current" from the Intro, but changed it back to "is".  If you disagree with this, please let's discuss the matter.  Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

A Shot at Love with Tila Tequila
Refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to A Shot at Love with Tila Tequila. Your edit to A Shot at Love with Tila Tequila constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. Flyer22 (talk) 04:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)