User talk:LillyAnna

on the article anti jewish arabism
I would have suggested that this article should be deleted on the poll taking page but I am not an administrator.

To LillyAnna and other users wondering why this article is being considered for deletion I would like to express the following: (Most of this is my personal opinion)

1. Obviously, this article contains extremely biased point of views that are not documented by a neutral source. It does not contain "the other perspective".

2. Right from the beginning of the article, false or at least largly disputed genuine thought is conveyed. The article starts by mentioning Gamal Abdul-Naser's supposed "anti-jewish arabis" with no background to the subject which is unencyclopedic. The claim that pan-Arabism and pan-Islamism took Hitler as a model is completely false. Islam itself teaches that all humans are equal, and has done that long before the UN, and generalizing thoughts of some people and attaching them to the whole ideology is wrong, since the ideology of pan-Arabism itself came to surface as an effort by the Arabs to gain independence from the Ottoman empire (both are muslims). The arab revolt against the Ottomans was in 1916 which was long before the arab-israeli conflict and long before israel or Gamal-Abdel Naser existed. Another (maybe not so convincing) example that Arabs view Hitler and his ideology as completely wrong is that in Jordan ( a neighbour to Israel ) all high school students take a lesson in their Arabic course about how the nazi superiority claims are bad. Also, arabs know that the were next on the list of Hitler's people to get rid of.

3.There is no mentioning that the increase in feelings of anti jewish come from the arab-israeli conflict and the fact that Israel (as a jewish state) till this day occupies arab lands despite the numerous UN resolutions condeming that.

4.This paragraph:

The origin of anti-Jewish feelings among Arabs do not originate from what they preceive as 'the occupation of Palestine' and the creation of Israel. Even before the creation of the Israeli state in 1948 on what was before Palestine, a largely uninhabited terrain, many Jews were recorded attacked in various settlements by Arabs since the late 1800's [6].

is clearly biased and unethical and has been taken from another deleted section in another article.

phrases as "what they perceive" is too rude to be in Wikipedia and also is historically incorrect. "What they perceive" as the occupation os palestine is an actuall historical fact. in other words "their perception is accurate". Also, "the creation of the israeli state on a laregly uninhabited land" is a ridiculous statement. That land was Palestine. and there were palestinian cities on the coast of the mediterranean before there was israel. cities such as "Yafa" and many others. The phrase "laregly uninhabited land" seems to try to make it legal to create new states in areas where there is a low population in another state. Imagine some people from some origin decide to make their own state in let's say a part of france or canada with low population density just because it is "laregly uninhabited".

5.Almost all the sources are from shady websites. The websites are by jews and for jews. No arab point of view has been included and no UN or other independent documentaion has been added. websites that are made to support a biased point of view should not be references for an neutral encyclopedia article.

If you still don't find these reasons good enough I can explain more, but I'm bored with typing..

Anybody's replies are welcome.. Contrieng (talk) 21:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)