User talk:Lilsarg

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:51, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ROBERT GILLAM


A tag has been placed on ROBERT GILLAM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Noiratsi (talk) 15:38, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Robert Gillam
I have "userfied" the page for you - moved into a sub-page in your user space at User:Lilsarg/Robert Gillam where you can work on it. If it is to be kept, it needs to establish WP:Notability, Wikipedia's name for its inclusion criterion, which is not a matter of saying so but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? More information at WP:Notability (people) and WP:42, and general advice at Your first article.

The name should not be in all caps, by the way: on the Internet that is considered SHOUTING. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:41, 6 December 2012 (UTC)