User talk:Lilygc

License tagging for Image:Dry It Book Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dry It Book Cover.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 06:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Biographies
Please take a look at the format and requirements for biographies of living persons. You have contributed a number of articles which do not meet the criteria. Thanks! Magichands 18:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Problem with license/terms of use for your image
Hi, Thanks for uploading your image, Image:Paul_Giambarba.jpg.

Unfortunately, there's a problem with the license; on one hand, you specify that the image was uploaded under the GFDL license. On the other hand, the upload summary says "All rights reserved."

These contradict each other; the GFDL grants certain rights of reuse. Also, I regret that due to WP's license, we cannot accept images under the terms "all rights reserved".

Would be grateful if you could clarify what you meant. Thanks! Fourohfour 13:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Paul Giambarba.jpg
(Further to question asked above)

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Paul Giambarba.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fourohfour 22:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Further: This image has now been deleted (not by me) because we received no response. Shame, it was a good picture and improved the article.
 * However, we need our pictures to be freely distributable under the GFDL license, and it would be unfair (and illegal) of us to re-use your image like that if you are unwilling for that to happen.
 * If you don't mind freely distributing it under the GFDL terms, please feel free to re-upload it. Thanks! :-) Fourohfour 15:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Lilygc! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Paul Giambarba -

Proposed deletion of Paul Giambarba


The article Paul Giambarba has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP for almost 3 years

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 18:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael D. Fay for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael D. Fay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michael D. Fay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:19, 31 August 2013 (UTC)