User talk:Limaj daas

Augury (band)
If the logs are to be believed, I was neither the last deleter nor the admin who protected the page. Anyway, I've lifted the protection for the page, but obviously that doesn't mean it can't be deleted again, so make sure you include references for notability, maintain neutrality and don't paste from websites, good luck  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  10:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I think that it's still of dubious notability, but I'll let it take its chances  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  15:46, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created, such as with Augury, have been considered disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 00:01, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Nabeel Nihal Chishty for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nabeel Nihal Chishty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nabeel Nihal Chishty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 07:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Nabeel-Nihal.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Nabeel-Nihal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 09:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Havoc in Quebec City for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Havoc in Quebec City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Havoc in Quebec City until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 15:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hopeless Hopes


The article Hopeless Hopes has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced article fails WP:NALBUM, as well as having been tagged for having one source for more than ten years."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HorrorLover555 (talk) 22:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)