User talk:Limanarui33.1982

AfC notification: Draft:Changzhi Li, Professor has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Changzhi Li, Professor. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello! Thank you for all your time.
 * ow I´m a bit lost what to do more.
 * I know there is another draft that I started previously with another login (@limanarui33). what happend is that the password is ALWAYS given error. I tried to talk to someone but it´s really difficult to understand how.
 * For that reason I created a new login (@limanarui33.1982) and restarted.
 * At this point I can say the innitially page can be deleted mas I cannot understyand how.
 * I also cannot edit the title to remove Professor.
 * I also cannot add the photo.
 * Can you help me?
 * Thank you
 * Li Mana Rui. Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 16:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Changzhi Li, Professor (April 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Changzhi Li, Professor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Changzhi_Li,_Professor Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jamiebuba&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Changzhi_Li,_Professor reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 16:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Other stuff exists
Using other articles as examples to mimic does not always work, as there are tens of thousands of articles that do not meet Wikipedia's current standards. That said, academics who ocupy endowed chairs or are IEEE Fellows usually justify articles. If you get this accepted the Reviewer will decide if Professor is a needed part of the title. David notMD (talk) 04:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your feedback. Meanwhile should I wait for the reviewer decision or should I do something? Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 08:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Changzhi Li, Professor has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Changzhi Li, Professor. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Changzhi Li has been accepted
 Changzhi Li, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Changzhi_Li help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!
 Welcome to Wikipedia, Limanarui33.1982! 

what´s next
Hello!

As requested I add some new references based on newspapers and some more categories. What should I do next so that the "issues emark" in the top of the page disappear?

Thank you,

Li Ma NaRui Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 09:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

unfortunately i´ll remove the page
Dea Sirs:

I´ve asking for assistance but I can not solve the comment " This article has multiple issues." on Professor´s Li wikipage.

The comment keeps appering on the top of the professor´s page and I don´t know what else can I do to remove it.

I put so much effort and references from different sources to validate the statements in the page, so much more than other pages that can be found on wikipedia and that don´t have any comment at all - and don´t know what to do more...

Thank you for the opportunity but I really don´t know how to move forward and it really can not continues with the honors and accomplishes of the Professor not validated.

Because the comment insinuates a lack of credibility and in order not to offend the teacher's professionalism i´ll delete the page.

regards,

Li Ma NaRui

Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 15:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm Grabup. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Changzhi Li have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Grab Up -  Talk  15:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * To delete the article go through AfD or PROD, you can't simply blank the article Grab Up  -  Talk  15:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with... I´m sorri, I can not understand what to do to eliminate the comments "This article has multiple issues." at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Changzhi_Li Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 12:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Every sentence should have a footnote to a source that a reader could use to verify the statement. For instance, the second section under Academic career cites no source. The third section under Academic career only has footnotes for some of the claims. The Early life and education has statements given without providing sources.
 * If you cannot provide an acceptable source for the information (where did you get it?), it will have to be removed.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 12:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * While we're working on the other issues, perhaps you can clarify why the photo you uploaded also appears here: Is this a photo you took yourself?  — jmcgnh (talk)  (contribs) 12:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * It is the Professor photo. taken by himself Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Don´t understant the statements:
 * ->"the second section under Academic career cites no source." : This is a detail description of the topics of the Lab Biomedical Integrated Devices and Systems (BIDS) [cited in 11].
 * ->"The third section under Academic career only has footnotes for some of the claims." It is difficult to find all the link for all the publications, workshops and conferences. Sometimes, as the conferences end, the sites are no longer available.
 * The link you indicate: https://ing.unipg.it/files/eventi/didattica/changzhi_30_10_23.jpg is one of the many proofs of the professor beign invited to talk somewhere. Should we provide ALL those links?!
 * -> The Photo of the professor you mentiones, appears in several places as it is the one he used the most when invited to talk at conferences. Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 16:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I've tagged the photo as missing permission. Based on what you said, it is not your 'own work' and you do not have the right to release it the way you did. Wikimedia Commons has strict rules about copyright and you'll need to provide better evidence.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 19:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Overall, I'd say that the professor likely meets the notability requirements of WP:NACADEMICS and some of what you've written supports that. On the other hand, you appear to continue misunderstanding what's required in a biography as far as inline citations. If you write something, reviewers expect to see a footnote to a source that supports what you wrote. Anything without such supporting footnotes should be removed from the article. If you cannot find a source for something you think you want to say, restrain yourself and do not say it.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 19:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)