User talk:Limsmaster

LabVantage
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of LabVantage, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.labvantage.com/companyinfo/aboutlabvantage/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of LabVantage
A tag has been placed on LabVantage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Edison (talk) 20:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Labvantage
A tag has been placed on Labvantage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 21:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of LabVantage
A tag has been placed on LabVantage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 21:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 21:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 21:13, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with LabVantage
Hello. Concerning your contribution, LabVantage, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, LabVantage appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. LabVantage has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Yourname (talk) 21:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

LabVantage
Cunard (talk) 22:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Laboratory information management system
Hello,

With the idea of avoiding Edit warring, I'm writing to explain my reasoning behind the removal of the vendors links. You accuse me of "play[ing] God" when all I seek to do is ensure that Wikipedia's standards are followed.

As I stated before, Wikipedia has a policy on link spamming. You can find it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Spam#External_link_spamming

Verbatim: "Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam."

That's indeed what is going on with this vendor list, and that's why it's being removed.

There is a compromise, however. Please look at this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ERP_vendors#ERP_vendors

Note how ALL of the vendor links lead to Wikipedia pages. We can include a list of example vendors, but only if they link to a Wikipedia page. Two of the vendors on the list you insist on reinstating do this. I'm willing to reinstate the list, but only include those with Wikipedia links. If this continues to get abused by other LIMS providers trying to promote themselves, then I see no choice but to do away with it entirely.

Regards,

Lostraven (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)