User talk:Liné1

Welcome to Wikipedia from TravisTX
Hi,. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four squiggles (~&#126;); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put  (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Travis talk  22:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Angiosperm Phylogeny Website
The importance I'm speaking of refers to Wikipedia's notability criteria for web content, and the references do not refer to how it is referred to within Wikipedia, but external, 3rd party verifiable, reliable sources that establish the aforementioned notability. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I've made some edits and modifications to bring the article up to par. I think it will last now. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

I've basically re-written the Angiosperm Phylogeny Website article, and would welcome your views as a recent contributor. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:41, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Seems fine to me. Could you add a line to specify that APWebsite does not describe APGIII ?
 * Cheers Liné1 (talk) 14:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

FPC
Responding to your mini-manifesto here, I would urge you to check out the FP link in my signature, and to reply to me if you think we might be sharing some of the same ideas. I would be interested in working towards a narrower definition of what qualifies as giving us the best encyclopaedic value. Best wishes. Samsara (FA • FP) 21:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Harry E. Luther for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry E. Luther is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Harry E. Luther until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cranloa12n (talk) 23:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)