User talk:LindsayWWP

September 2009
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Wuh Wuz  Dat  14:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of financial information from the WWP article.
Just in case this isn't obvious, it is EXTREMELY not kosher for someone from the WWP to come on to Wikipedia and do things like delete the list of salaries of WWP executives or remove mention of the largest contributor to the organization.

This article is supposed to be an encyclopedia entry, primarily a compilation of factual and published research on the organization. It is not supposed to read like a WWP marketing document, it needs to be straightforward and objective and not a narrative lauding the WWP or its founders. I've acceded to some of your changes but Wikipedia is not a platform or venue for you to promote the WWP through so don't expect to get away with using it as such.

I'm sorry that you probably had a bit of a shock when you came back and saw that much of the work you'd done (albeit mostly cutting and pasting work) was gone but I was following Wikipedia copyright violation policy (WP:COPYVIO): to ensure that we aren't illegally publishing other peoples' work, when we detect copyrighted content mixed into an article the policy is to nuke it from orbit - to delete every shred of copyrighted material and replace it with originally-written stuff. --❨Ṩtruthious ℬandersnatch❩ 05:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Procedures
--User:LindsayWWP 11 September 2009 (UTC) I apologize as I have now read standard Wikipedia procedures, and will continue to familiarize myself with those. Thank you for all of your help and insight. Any information updated on WWP's site will be factual and in a non-bias form and also always referenced. Thank you for all of your help with this site.