User talk:Lindsey.cobb/sandbox

I'm not sure what I'm doing with the references. I only have two sources but when I put them in it acted like I have over 20 sources. I also plan on added strong references to prove that pharmacological treatment is strongly adviced against by most health care organizations in order to make this section more nuetral.

Peer Review
It looks like you've done a good job of expanding on this section of the article with your edits. Other than the issue with your references that you seem to already be aware of, I would really just suggest reading through what you've written as a way to catch any words that might be missing, so that everything makes sense. Everything you have here is very concise and seems to flow very well, though. -- Crystalan13 (talk) 02:12, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

This sections for the original article looks ten times better than what the other author posted. Its very detailed about the treatments. It explains different treatments. It also is formatted better than the original. I like the format that you used and the different treatments that you have discussed. I suggest that you explain those pharmacological management section that you have listed at the end. It comes off like you just listed forms of medication. It looks like you weren't finished and I acknowledged that. Good work though. -- Jsykes521 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC).