User talk:Lindseyma

1316 Moss Steet
A template has been added to the article 1316 Moss Steet, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Pilotboi / talk / contribs 21:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry that you feel discouraged about the process of Wikipedia, but you need to be careful when postngi articles. The title was wrong, for one thing, and the various other problems would have taken a long time for someone to clean up. It is also questionable if the house deserves its own article, but you could certainly make a section about it in the West Bluff Historic District article. Academic Challenger 23:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)