User talk:Lingveno

Proposed deletion of Anhor


The article Anhor has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of HearMeOut


The article HearMeOut has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails the WP:GNG, no evidence of significant coverage and article was created by a paid editor."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 12:04, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of HearMeOut for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HearMeOut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/HearMeOut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 16:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HearMeOut company.png
Thanks for uploading File:HearMeOut company.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Spotsetter


The article Spotsetter has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This seems like it was never covered by WP:RS before the acquisition, received a few articles that just mention the acquisition without going into detail, and will obviously not ever be covered again. Simply non-notable, as it utterly fails the 'significant coverage' criteria for its own article. The article was also created by a user who was blocked for undisclosed paid editing."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request

 * I've discussed this appeal with Lingveno off-wiki, so I'll leave it for another administrator to review. (pinging, as the blocking admin.) Lingveno has stated that, if unblocked, they would like to edit using their new account (Fordaemdur). — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC)