User talk:Linhdinh99

Any suggestions?
I just created an article on Skanky Possum and within 20 minutes some other editor slapped a "speedy delete" tag on it. I'm trying to beef up the article to show it's notability in any way I can because the publication, it seems to me, deserves a small article. If you're the Linh Dinh I think you are, maybe you have a suggestion or two? I'm all ears. Noroton 04:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Noroton, How do I communicate with you directly? I certainly agree with you that Skanky Possum deserves an article. I know Dale Smith and Hoa Nguyen pretty well... They deserve articles too, as a matter of fact. Here's my email linhdinh99 (at) yahoo (dot) com, if you want to get in touch with me directly.

Linh


 * Email incoming. As I explain in it, just click on the blue user name, that brings you to that person's User Page, then click on the "discussion" tab at the top of that User page. Then put your message there (at the bottom of the page). Or email me back. Noroton 22:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Pham Thi Hoai.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pham Thi Hoai.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 13:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikivietlit
A tag has been placed on Wikivietlit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Wikivietlit. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 12:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Ca Dao copyvio
Hey, I just want to let you know what I reverted the speedy deletion tag for that article. While I have no doubt myself, too, that it is a copyvio, the link doesn't work, and we can't put up those tags if we don't have the links, can we :p So.. would you mind re-checking that link/website? Tyty :) &mdash; Nova  Dog  &mdash;  ( contribs ) 02:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Vietnamese Literature
Hi, I don't agree with your edit on the vietnamese literature page that says:

"When Nguyễn Du composed his masterpiece, the incomparable 3,254 lines poem, "Kim Vân Kiều.” The story of a prostitute, it pilfered its plot line from an obscure 17th century Chinese novel of the same name."

I may be wrong so please correct me, but I believe the poem is more fittingly referred to as "Truyen Kieu" in order to differentiate it from the original Chinese novel "Kim Van Kieu"? It might be referred to as "Kim Van Kieu" as well, I don't know, but either way it's probably better to distinguish the two by using "Truyen Kieu". Also I disagree with the use of the term "pilfered", which connotates petty theft. A lot of the greatest classical works from many countries may have borrowed the plot from other sources, such as Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet (among countless other works) which used the plot from existing published works, but the works themselves are original or distinctive enough. I agree that obviously he "used the plot", "borrowed", or whatever such terms, but I think pilfered has too much of a negative connotation that discredits the innovation and uniqueness of the work itself.

I changed it but wanted to alert you because I don't want an edit war, and just wanted to see your opinion on it. Thanks. Goodscrownestore (talk) 20:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)