User talk:Link Smurf/Archive 1

Blocked
I've blocked this account for two weeks for abusing multiple accounts per the findings of Sockpuppet investigations/Link Smurf. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I've extended this to two weeks from today for block evasion. Jafeluv (talk) 08:29, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your signature
You need to consult Signatures which prohibits images in signatures.  Imzadi 1979  →   23:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I am removed I-69 image from my signature preferences. Link Smurf 23:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of unused highways in New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I am forget to put "Buffalo, New York", but i fix it. Link Smurf 18:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia
 You have been blocked since your account has been "compromised"; you posted your password in a public place. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Appealing a block. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:24, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

What I can do then to continue editing articles related to the highways? Link Smurf 22:27, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Create a new account. --jpgordon:==( o ) 03:17, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank! Link Smurf 03:42, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Just a friendly note, but to avoid accusations of sock puppetry, you should either disclose a link between this account and your new one, or e-mail the Arbitration Committee. Given that you've had alternate accounts indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry (see Sockpuppet_investigations/Link_Smurf/Archive), it would behoove you to be transparent in creating and using a new account. (You might be able to ask an administrator to unblock and continue using that account in the future.)  Imzadi 1979   →   03:57, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, if you're creating a new account, please don't copy my user pages again. That was the issue that prompted the WP:SPI that got the and  accounts blocked. Now, because you copied them again,  has been blocked and  was found in the SPI.
 * The rules are simple: you're allowed a single user account under normal circumstances. Now, you were limited to the oldest one, but that's been compromised so you need a new account. Create it right, associate it with your old account, stop impersonating me, and you'll be fine. Otherwise, it just feels creepy that you copy my user pages like you have.  Imzadi 1979  →   05:48, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I now understand. Link Smurf 18:46, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

New account
I created a new account (User:Link 2 Osorio), I will not copy the Imzadi1979 account style and I will respect any rule including no posting my password to avoid a compromised account. Link Smurf 01:58, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

11 de Septiembre de 2001 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 11 de Septiembre de 2001. Since you had some involvement with the 11 de Septiembre de 2001 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

11 Septiembre 2001 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 11 Septiembre 2001. Since you had some involvement with the 11 Septiembre 2001 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

11 septiembre 2001 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 11 septiembre 2001. Since you had some involvement with the 11 septiembre 2001 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

11 de septiembre de 2001 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 11 de septiembre de 2001. Since you had some involvement with the 11 de septiembre de 2001 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

11/S listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 11/S. Since you had some involvement with the 11/S redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
TJH2018  talk  21:44, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
TJH2018  talk  21:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)