User talk:Linnea78

I want the article I have created simply removed!!! --Linnea78 (talk) 11:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC) It is not a reason to block anyone!!!!


 * I'm sorry, but only applies if you are the sole author. Looking at the history of the article in question, there have been contributions from several other authors.  TN X Man  12:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

If you would look at the history properly, you would notice that nobody else has added anything to the article. They have simply removed or reorganised. I am the sole author, and main editor. --Linnea78 (talk) 13:13, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Could you please unblock me. It was done unfairly. Thanks.--Linnea78 (talk) 13:18, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

I want it removed, no matter what the outcome of the discussion. --Linnea78 (talk) 18:13, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You have made your opinion quite clear, thank you. DMacks (talk) 19:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Jayjg (talk) 18:52, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Jayjg (talk) 01:51, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. If you decide to request unblock, you'll need to commit to using only one account, and you'll need to explain your plan for writing about topics other than yourself. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Also have not written about myself, that has been explained to FisherQueen as well, but she does not understand. Can I please have her blocked. I do not want to continue being harrassed by her --Linnea78 (talk) 07:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * In this edit you identify yourself as Annika Väisänen. You have used the accounts User:Apollo789, User:Moveda, and User:213.145.198.14, and tried to pretend that you were four different people in order to "vote" multiple times in a deletion discussion, not realizing that this wouldn't affect the outcome. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dele Ladimeji


The article Dele Ladimeji has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Long time unsourced BLP with questionable notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 05:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)