User talk:Lioneyes2018

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lisa-Jayne Lewis (May 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lisa-Jayne Lewis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lisa-Jayne Lewis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lisa-Jayne_Lewis Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Legacypac&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lisa-Jayne_Lewis reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Lisa-Jayne Lewis has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lisa-Jayne Lewis. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 16:15, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lisa-Jayne Lewis


A tag has been placed on Draft:Lisa-Jayne Lewis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Legacypac (talk) 16:15, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm Gaia Octavia Agrippa. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Jayne Ozanne, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 21:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC) Hi - I cannot edit on you talk page because Wikipedia doesn't make any sense. I see that you have restored the section about Jayne's personal life which is causing her distress having that information displayed publicly. I work for the publishers of her new book and she asked if I could remove it which I did. I also added a few pieces of additional information that you have removed. The information added came from the person themselves and are correct. I don't really understand how Wikipedia works in that only certain people can make edits which are approved. I don't know what kind of reliable source you think I didn't cite but as far as I remember I used citations.Lisajaynelewis (talk) 06:38, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Lisajaynelewis, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Jayne Ozanne, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms our use and policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 21:25, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Ok I am really confused by this message, I'm not sure what conflict of interest you think I have? I know Jayne in a professional manner but surely that is not a conflict of interest that would taint my edits. I work for the publishers of her latest book and in the run up to that she asked if I would correct some of the errors on her Wikipedia page, surely it is better to have correct information rather than something wrong by someone who does not know her. The page initially was set up by a friend of hers, surely that is more conflict of interest? I am just really confused by Wikipedia, it's not at all user-friendly unless you are a computer geek and understand all this coding, it seems to be that some peoples contributions are seen as correct and everyone else's are just deleted, I'm just not sure what I am doing wrong so a little guidance would be useful, thanks so much Lisajaynelewis (talk) 06:45, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I suspect this message is more related to Draft:Lisa-Jayne Lewis, which was deleted for being a promotional autobiography. However, being asked by the subject of an article to make edits to it is a conflict of interest. It means that you may not be able to edit the article in a neutral manner. It would be better to propose edits by placing the code on the article talk page along with what you think should be added, changed, or removed.
 * If you need help getting acquainted with how Wikipedia works (both policy-wise and how to actually edit), you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or Help desk. clpo13(talk) 07:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Right I see that for my own article which I really don't care about, I always suspected that you had to be one of the 'chosen' ones to be able to create a page. But I don't see how a subject asking for incorrect information about them to be removed is a conflict of interest, that really makes no sense, removing or correcting information about someone or something you know surely is the point of Wikipedia and none of the edit's I made were made were opinion-based they were purely informational, I now see that there are mistakes back on the page. Lisajaynelewis (talk) 07:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Hello, I left a COI warning here because you made a large, detailed, unreferenced, addition to Jayne Ozanne: this would suggest you have personal knowledge of the subject or you didn't know how to reference. I first left you a warning saying that biographies of living persons need to be fully referenced; you made the changes again so I assumed you may have a COI. You have now declared a clear conflict of interest: "I know Jayne in a professional manner but surely that is not a conflict of interest that would taint my edits. I work for the publishers of her latest book and in the run up to that she asked if I would correct some of the errors on her Wikipedia page". As per WP:COIEDIT, "you should disclose your COI when involved with affected articles" and "you are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly".
 * The details you added were unreferenced and therefore removed. The section you removed was fully referenced and therefore replaced.
 * There is no way of confirming that the information you have added is correct unless it has a reference. There is also no way to confirm that you are indeed acting on behalf of Ozanne: although if you are, as above, you shouldn't be editing the article directly.
 * Everything in the article is fully referenced with reliable sources, and nothing is libel nor in convention of WP:BLPPRIVACY. If Ozanne herself would like to make a complaint, she can do so through WP:BLPCOMPLAIN. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 17:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * PS, who are you referring to here: "The page initially was set up by a friend of hers, surely that is more conflict of interest?"? Thanks, Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 18:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

That I don't know, sorry, she just told me it was a friend - thanks for explaining above, makes perfect sense now. I will tell Jayne that if she want to remove the Personal Life section she will need to do it as a complaint. I am still very new to Wikipedia editing so your explanations have helped me a lot. Many Thanks Lioneyes2018 (talk) 10:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * That's alright, I'm glad that you understand now. Please do pass on the WP:BLPCOMPLAIN link to Ozanne, I'd be grateful. Wikipedia is here to educate and inform, but we do recognise personal privacy. 19:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Lisa-Jayne Lewis. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC) apologies, I thought I was just clarifying some details that's all, thanks for removing if it is unacceptable content. Lioneyes2018 (talk) 12:07, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

February 2024
Hi Lioneyes2018! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message, I’m a bit green on Wikipedia. Your comment is duly noted for future reference. Lioneyes. Lioneyes2018 (talk) 14:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FLEISCH (band)


The article FLEISCH (band) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't appear notable, barely sourced"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IgelRM (talk) 02:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I believe this band to be as notable as many others on Wikipedia. They have a sizeable following in the indie metal scene in the UK and i disagree that this is not well sourced as the information is sourced from credible independent music media in both the UK and Germany.
 * Please advise me on how to stop the deletion of this page which I believe should be eligible for inclusion on Wikipedia. Lioneyes2018 (talk) 01:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)