User talk:Lirter

Please do not remove deletion tags. If you have concerns, raise them on the article's talk page. If the article is worth keeping, it will be kept, but please don't interfere with the deletion review process. (|--  UlT i MuS  ( U 18:04, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I read the tag, it said 'improve the article'. I improved the article.  You keep reverting and losing my edits.  Lirter 18:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The concern isn't improving the article, it's that the subject is not notable. The word doesn't exist in any dictionary out there, and Google returns almost no results in a search for the word. If you are interested in keeping the article around, you must provide a source for your claim that it is a real word that is in common use. This is your last warning for removing deletion tags and disrupting the deletion process. (|--   UlT i MuS  ( U 18:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * In fact, you were allowed to remove the prod template. This makes it contested deletion, which shouldn't be proposed again; this is why I have brought it to a full discussion/vote instead. - Mike Rosoft 18:13, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

You're not notable, recommend you be deleted. Lirter 18:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


 * You're right, I'm not. Which is why I don't make articles about myself. And please be aware of WP:NPA. Personal attacks on others are not acceptable at Wikipedia. (|--   UlT i MuS  ( U 18:10, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm not making an article about myself.

See: Lydbury Grammar Clinic Lirter 18:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


 * No, but you're making an article about something unimportant which you probably fabricated. (|--   UlT i MuS  ( U 18:13, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Your singular opinion is not enough to determine importance. Who cares about Meridian Green?