User talk:Lisa0005

May 2016
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Widr (talk) 08:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and renamed this account. PhilKnight (talk) 01:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Am I able to continue working on my draft, or has it been removed? The red heading above says that 'this user is currently blocked'. Unsure of next steps. Am I blocked? Or not?
 * Yes, you are still blocked, because only the username issue has been dealt with, not the issue of the nature of your editing. And no, you can't continue to work on any draft as long as you are blocked.
 * I have unformatted your latest post as an unblock request, as it was not actually an unblock request, but just a request for information.
 * To help assessing your unblock request, can you please clarify a couple of points? (1) You said above that you "asked to use the company account": does this mean that you took over this account, after it had previously been used by one or more people working for the company you edited about? (2) You say "we did NOT submit it for review" and "we did a page refresh". Does this mean that more than one person was involved in the editing that this account was doing? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes, the account had been used by one person at the company in the past. When I was thinking about the article I asked them if they had a wikipedia account because I thought that made sense. No. Sorry, too used to royal we. Correct, I did not submit it for review. I used [Show preview] repeatedly as I developed the article, especially when trying to get certain text formatting right. During one of these preview/edit loops (after about 13 of them), chrome said the web site had stopped responding. So I hit F5 to resubmit my edits, and wikipedia took this as a 'Submit' action before the article was finished. I don't know why.

Your draft article, Draft:DataMystic Software Company


Hello, Lisa0005. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "DataMystic Software Company".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)