User talk:Lisa01011

Nomination of Ko Ko Bop Challenge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ko Ko Bop Challenge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ko Ko Bop Challenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐐT₳LKᐬ  13:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 05:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)== Lay I NEED U ==

WOW, good job on creating Lay's I NEED YOU page, your work is impressive and quick. fighting

Unblock request

 * please can you review this request? The SPI page is Sockpuppet investigations/CJojoC. Thanks &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:58, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Lisa01011: are you and your "sister" editing from the same or different devices? Are you ever online at the same time? Are you aware of the guidelines at WP:FAMILY, and if so, why did you not follow them? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:11, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , the tie to the original master was stale here, so the block was behavioral in addition to the CU data. The block was recommended by a clerk, and I concurred with the recommendation after reviewing the evidence. That being said, since the master was stale, and I'm not familiar with the intricacies of this sock family, I don't mind a second set of eyes here. your thoughts would also probably be helpful. Rob on what the technical evidence showed, and explicit on the behavioral side. TonyBallioni (talk) 10:43, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The technical evidence was clear. I will point only to WP:FAMILY. ~ Rob 13 Talk 14:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , we are both using one device. We sometimes proof-read each others articles and change things. As you can see we are mainly focus on articles in the field of Kpop which has been our passion for a few years. We thought about contributing to the database by updating and adding articles. We are sorry that we did not know about WP:FAMILY from the beginning. We were informed about it after the sock puppetry block. After we signed up for Wikipedia we did read guidelines about article writing etc., but not the one about IP usage which we admit was a grave mistake on our site. ~ User:Lisa01011 17:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I will first ask a preliminary question before proceeding. Lisa, did you or your sister previously edit under the accounts or, or are these your first and sole accounts?  ℯ  xplicit  00:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * and are not our accounts. We only use  and . Those two are our first and sole accounts. ~ User:Lisa01011 15:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The reason the investigation was initiated was because of your account specifically. From the beginning, you were very familiar with Wikipedia, like formatting references using the Cite web template (even formatting the dates exactly the same: YYYY-MM-DD) and using columns. You cited Korean-language references, which CJojoC also did, and I feel like I can assume with a high degree of confidence that you (as well as CJojoC) are not fluent in the language. You also share the similarity of copyright violations: citing one source, and then copying the text from another as you did in . Constant copyright violations was the reason CJojoC was blocked in the first place, and your continuation of that is just a little too eerie. Then, of course, the exact same interests (particularly Exo-related topics). You and Wexonex3 also uploaded the same cover (you uploaded File:The Power of Music EXO cover.jpg and File:The War - The Power of Music Cover.jpg), further showing a degree of familiarity similar to CJojoC, and the similarity in the name of the files. You edited 29 of the same articles CJojoC did, and you share 21 with Wexonex3, and all three share 16 of the same articles. The editing behavior between you two is almost exactly the same. It's one thing to share similar interests, but another when you're both editing articles of a different topic, as the accounts did with Room No.7, Party People (TV series), Dear Archimedes, and List of awards and nominations received by Twice.  ℯ  xplicit  00:10, 2 November 2017 (UTC)