User talk:Lisa11777

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hysterectomy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. X X X antiuser eh? 21:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hysterectomy, you will be blocked from editing. X X X antiuser eh? 21:08, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Cheery welcome message
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! JBsupreme ( talk ) 01:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Hysterectomy, robotic surgery
Hi, please make liberal use of discussion/talk pages to clarify your intentions. Things will be a lot easier for you if you simply ask for help.

In the case of robotic surgery for hysterectomy you need to be very careful with citations. Especially in the "Comparison of techniques" subsection references should be of high quality and not just anecdotal or manufacturer sponsored trials.

To substantiate claims like shorter hospital stay, shorter time of surgery, less injuries you need references of very good quality, en par with Cochrane or eVAL.

For claims like "fastest growing" a quote from a major health care provider, FDA or similar is acceptable but needs to be put into perspective, ie robotic hysterectomy is still largely irrelevant, unknown, very little data etc.

You need to understand understand that in a few cases companies or individuals have tried to abuse wikipedia for advertisements for this reason you should avoid everything that looks like unsubstantiated advertising.

Assessing new techniques or medications in the field of medicine is particularly problematic - even the merits of laparoscopic hysterectomy are still matter of heated discussions despite there beeing a large body of statistical data about the issues.

You may consider to improve the article about robotic surgery, especially go through the references and add good ones. Richiez (talk) 12:48, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

I have replied to your comment on my talk page. Richiez (talk) 23:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 01:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)