User talk:LisaG60

LisaG60, you are invited to the Teahouse!
I hope im doing this right, ha. But, in regards to edits to congresswoman Diana Degette's page I posted this as a reply, and will repeat it here:

I am new to wikipedia but I did leave a note in the edit summary as to the reason for my changes. I can see them by clicking on the page's revision history. I will repeat them to you prior to reaching out to the wikipedia team. The changes made by user Davinci17 clearly do not comply with Wikipedia's policies. The added section "Democratic Presidential Nomination" contains repeated statements of the author's opinion, and is sourced by linking to the Congresswoman's political opponent's website.

The added "2016" section is deliberately misleading and doesnt come close to painting a complete or accurate picture of the congresswoman's donors. It deliberately leaves out facts to push a particular agenda, it does not seem appropriate.

Again, I am new, but the edits seem to be Tedentious editing. They are obviously partisan and skewed, and do not make any effort to conform to the neutral point of view 2605:E000:1319:417D:50FA:1170:A29D:CFF4 (talk) 17:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)