User talk:Lisaaheld

Feedback on your article
Hello Lisaaheld, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay. I have nothing to comment, thank you for your work! I will take care of the publication after/during the session of today. Romaine (talk) 07:48, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: good
 * Links: sufficient
 * Headers: sufficient
 * Context/timeframe: sufficient
 * How was the book received: sufficient
 * References: sufficient

Nomination of Wahre und Falsche "Fauen-Emanzipation" for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wahre und Falsche "Fauen-Emanzipation" is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wahre und Falsche "Fauen-Emanzipation" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:27, 20 September 2020 (UTC)