User talk:Lisamcgrillis/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, Lisamcgrillis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited was Lisa McGrillis, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hack (talk) 12:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Lisa McGrillis


The article Lisa McGrillis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  14:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lisa McGrillis
Hello, Lisamcgrillis. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Lisa McGrillis, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Lisa McGrillis to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:45, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lisa McGrillis


The article Lisa McGrillis has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. One "reference" doesn't mention Lisa McGrillis, while most others merely include her in cast lists, or otherwise barely mention her. None of the references is coverage of her in an independent reliable source.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:20, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Autobiography is a very bad idea here
Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Lisa McGrillis. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  14:22, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, Lisamcgrillis. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Lisa McGrillis, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Redalert2fan (talk) 14:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012 (continued)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lisa McGrillis, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. This is particularly important in a case where you appear to have a conflict of interest, and perhaps even more so in a case where you have written an article about yourself and one of the notices you remove is an autobiography of interest notice. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:41, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Actually, it has just occurred to me that it is possible that you may not in fact be Lisa McGrillis, as sometimes new editors choose a username which refers to the subject they intend to write about, rather than themselves. If so, it would obviously cast the removal of the "autobiography" in a different light, but it would mean that you had a misleading username, which would be against the username policy. Can you please clarify this by stating whether you are in fact Lisa McGrillis or not? JamesBWatson (talk) 19:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Lisa McGrillis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa McGrillis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lisa McGrillis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:00, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Redalert2fan (talk) 19:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Redalert2fan (talk) 19:57, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments
Hi Lisa, I noticed you tried to add in-line references. This is how you do it

so

gives