User talk:Lislestreet

Rimon Law Group
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rimon Law Group, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://interestalert.com/story/07170001aaa00704.iw/mckhan/ISRAEL01/israel.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Copyright
We can't really tell whether you're the copyright holder: we would require that such an assertion be proven by posting a specific release of content under the GFDL license on the website in question. The other matter is that of notability, which requires multiple references in independent media to establish that the subject is, in fact, notable. See also WP:CORP. Regards,  Acroterion  (talk)  01:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Rimon Law Group, Inc.
A tag has been placed on Rimon Law Group, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 05:21, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you indefinitely for repeated creation of the Ramon Law Group article. We have now deleted this three times, each time because you created it. It appears that you will continue this indefinitely, so I have been forced to block you indefinitely. If you want to contest this, use unblock with the reason for the unblock. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 06:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)