User talk:Lister171254

Spreed
Re: "other articles regarding spreed have been deleted due to 'Blatant Advertising' and I believe we have now been blacklisted."

This statement seems to indicate that you may have a conflict of interest in dealing with the subject. I would encourage you to review the linked page before writing another article on the topic (to reply to your question, the location "Spreed" is protected to prevent further re-creation). If the company is notable, eventually an uninvolved editor will write an article about it. The article which you submitted contained many terms that indicated a client relationship with the reader and did not appear to reflect Wikipedia's policy on maintaining a neutral point of view. It is all right to say things like "The use of spreed Web meetings is easy and intuitive" or "Extremely Reliable" if you have reliable, third-party sources (say, newspaper articles reviewing the service) that say so; however, it is not appropriate to do so in running text. The job of Wikipedia is to define and explain, not to recommend. Thus the new version of the article has been deleted under our guidelines for deletion, section General-11. But thank you for coming to Wikipedia, and I hope you will enjoy your stay here. Dekimasu よ! 03:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

If you object to the sentence that it's easy to use, than I'm happy to remove this, but overall I do not see much difference between the article I'm trying to post and other articles relating to Web Conferencing like or. I'm happy to follow any suggestions you may have in addition to removing any offending sentence(s)Lister171254 (talk) 21:42, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Since I'm not an admin I can't see what exactly was deleted, but based on the sub-pages you have (User:Lister171254/spreedSave, User:Lister171254/spreed2, and User:Lister171254/name of subpage) I would say they fail the general notability guideline as was pointed out above. If you look at WebEx or GoToMeeting they at least have two outside sources that have written about the country. -Optigan13 (talk) 05:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 22:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)