User talk:Lithere/sandbox

Peer Review (Hayden)
A lead section that is easy to understand: Intro is straight forward and gives basic knowledge of compound, but maybe add a picture of what it looks like

A clear structure: organized neatly!

Balanced coverage: Maybe mention some of the chemical / physical properties, as well as image of molecule structure. If you add links to some of the less known terms relating to the topic it will add clarity, or if there is no existing page, give brief description.

Neutral content: good!

Reliable sources: wide variety of sources used and all cited

-Peer Review by Hayden Manninen

Haydenmanninen (talk)

Peer Review (Andrea)
The introduction is a solid preview of what you're going to discuss in the article. The production section also looks great. In the uses section, I would consider either expanding on the meaning of some of the terms (i.e. HEMOPATCH) or linking to other articles that do so. You also mention the low toxicity of Blue 1 twice, so some rewording might make the section sound more professional and may convey information more efficiently. In the biomedical research section, you should watch for tense; at one point near the beginning of the section you are using present tense ("when human washed platelets are evaluated...") but you switch to past tense later in the sentence ("it was found..."). I believe it would be best to either write everything in present tense, but as long as you choose a tense and stick with it, you should be fine. Your sources all look non-biased and trustworthy, and you have enough of them. Overall, the article looks really good, with a solid balance of interesting information that is ordered in a logical way.

Rauscha (talk) 23:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review (Emma)
The introduction is very effective in showing what will be included in the article, but it seems that citations are needed for the information. I also like how you included a contents box after your introduction to show what you are covering in the rest of your article. The information included is clear and easy to follow, but I think you could include images to enhance the audience's understanding of the structure. The content is neutral and seems well cited.