User talk:Lithium6ion

Deep Vole Brook
Source for the name? USGS calls it just "Deep Brook". Just curious. Choess 09:15, 18 February 2006 (UTC)


 * That's OK, we can leave it in. "Deep Vole" just sounded odd, like a corruption of "Deep Vale" or something. Choess 22:50, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back
Hey, just saw that you're editing again. (You hit something on my watchlist.) Glad to see you back. Choess (talk) 02:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, that was it. It always warms my heart to see someone take such care with minutia. Choess (talk) 02:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK
Hi, Lithium. You deserve this far more than I do so please take it as a token of my gratitude.  ceran  thor 19:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Kings Pond Park

 * I didn't nominate; all I did was move it to the queue. nominated it. Regards, BencherliteTalk 07:10, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

New Jersey Streams: Nine Mile Run (tributary of Six Mile Run (New Jersey)
I am writing an article on the Nine Mile Run, which is a major tributary of the Six Mile Run. If you have any info, feel free to contribute. Thank you. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did appear to be constructive and has been appreciated. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ;) --Chemicalinterest (talk) 11:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

 * Welcome to the project. --Kumioko (talk) 02:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

New Years Message for WikiProject United States
With the first of what I hope will be monthly newsletters I again want to welcome you to the project and hope that as we all work together through the year we can expand the project, create missing articles and generally improve the pedia thought mutual cooperation and support. Now that we have a project and a solid pool of willing members I wanted to strike while the iron is hot and solicite help in doing a few things that I believe is a good next step in solidifiing the project. I have outlined a few suggestions where you can help with on the projects talk page. This includes but is not limited too updating Portal:United States, assessing the remaining US related articles that haven't been assessed, eliminating the Unrefernced BLP's and others. If you have other suggestions or are interested in doing other things feel free. I just wanted to offer a few suggestions were additional help is needed. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, comments or suggestions or you can always post something on the projects talk page. If you do not want to recieve a monthly message please put an * before your name on the members page.--Kumioko (talk) 03:33, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

New WikiProject United States Newsletter: February 2011 edition
Starting with the February 2011 issue WikiProject United States has established a newsletter to inform anyone interested in United States related topics of the latest changes. This newsletter will not only discuss issues relating to WikiProject United States but also: You may read or assist in writing the newsletter, subscribe, unsubscribe or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following this link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page or the Newsletters talk page. --Kumioko (talk) 20:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Portal:United States
 * 2) the United States Wikipedians Noticeboard
 * 3) the United States Wikipedians collaboration of the Month - The collaboration article for February is Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
 * 4) and changes to Wikipolicy, events and other things that may be of interest to you.

Stevenson Brook
I've spent a half an hour looking at Google map trying to figure out where Stevenson Brook is located as described in the Wikipedia article. Since you took the photos for the article, would you mind sending me a link of where Stevenson Brook is on Google map and/or complete and add Coord to the article. Thanks. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Now that you located it, I was able to see the brook from a Google map vier from Wagaraw road. Looks like they covered the brook up except for its mouth. I came to that article in helping TiMike empty Category:New Jersey articles missing geocoordinate data. Sounds exciting that you are out at sea. Are you saving the world, fishing, or moving goods? -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 08:40, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: North Hawthorne
I am a commons admin, I can rename the file. I realized a few days later that I had the wrong spot. Please don't show me pictures because I know what it looks like. I've been studying the Erie for several years. Can I at least ask you write a good article about it? Sick of seeing all these Erie stubs I have to work on. Also, use the Erie infobox I helped develop. Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 02:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * File has been renamed for clarity. Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 02:37, 18 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm fine with the title, all NYSW stations will keep that header anyway, due to the way the NYS&W was handled. I've fixed the template for you. Also I need to point out that that photo is not the roundhouse, that is the ex-NYSW Hawthorne stop, why is that in the sandbox? The code is 1127, the reason for the issue is that North Hawthorne was previously known as North Paterson in 1916, which is what the station is listed as. Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 03:42, 18 July 2012 (UTC)


 * This is the Port Authority for you, since photography is banned on PATH and such. Getting used to that. Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 04:04, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

No history? This article is severely lacking in history. For example, I see no mention that in 1939, the NYS&W wanted to bustitute from Butler to North Hawthorne instead of run trains. I see no construction date, etc. Headers need adjustment. Article in general needs serious work. Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 17:35, 28 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Most are external sources, including the big NYS&W book (forget its name off the top of my head). Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 00:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Article still needs some work, still very stubby, and I don't want it really moved until its at a C-class or higher. Description of services, description of the site, next station in line in both directions, terminals, etc are necessary. More history is also necessary. Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 03:49, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

I see an infobox in serious need of more information. The lead is lacking still, remember it should cover a summary of the article. The site & services sections should be merged and moved above history. The lack of citations in some areas need work. It's getting there. :) Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 17:58, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

We're just about there. I've got a couple things you need to do (in the following bullet list):
 * The last Susquehanna train ran June 30, 1966, not just June 1966. Make sure the article and infobox reflects this.
 * You can't have 1 Level 3-subheader in an article (per MOS). The easiest fix is to add a second one to the Site & Services section.
 * I am going to suggest renaming Site and Services to Station layout and services, which is what I use. (Make sure the capitalization follows what I just used per the MOS).
 * The history section is in dire need of Level 3-headers. Based on length, I'd suggest 3 of them (1891–1938 (give title please, not years), 1939–1966, post-1966 (again no years, give its own title and years involved, like "Post-passenger service (1966–present), etc.
 * Hawthorne's ZIP Code would be nice next to that.
 * Still some uncited statements I'd like to see fixed.
 * Also expand the lead some. Otherwise, I am pretty content with the article. Don't publish it without letting me get another look through. Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 21:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Also, if you're interested in the future, it would be nice to finish the commuter stations from Susquehanna Transfer to Butler with articles. My high suggestions would be the ones that stand first (Wortendyke, Wyckoff, Ridgefield Park, Butler (which has an article in need of improvement), Vreeland Avenue, Pompton Lakes, Bogota, Rochelle Park) then the demolished ones (Bloomingdale, Oakland/West Oakland (West Oakland is probably worthy of a subsection in the Oakland article), Crystal Lake/Campgaw (Arguably Crystal Lake can sit in Campgaw), Midland Park, Riverside, Broadway–Paterson, Passaic Junction, Prospect Avenue–Hackensack, Main Street & River Street (one was consolidated into the other if I remember correctly), Babbitt, North Bergen and Little Ferry). Up to you though. Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 21:24, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

I did see your response. Feel free to publish it. (Although I highly suggest citations for the uncited stuff.) Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 17:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The details about the site currently. Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 20:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Eh, you can use a photo for now. Works pretty well. Mitch 32 (There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 22:09, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Rutan Hill, New Jersey Volcano
According to the NJ state geologist (and the publications of their office), Rutan Hill is the state's only volcano. Prospect Hill and Snake Hill are only evidence of volcanic activity (early igneous rock formation), not a per se volcano. If you have a source that establishes otherwise, bring it. But the source cited establishes Rutan Hill as the only one in the state. I reverted your edits at Rutan Hill and at Sussex County, New Jersey.--ColonelHenry (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Hey. Got your message earlier about the list.  If I find anything else to contribute, I'll pass along. Lithium6ion (talk) 01:36, 2 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Apparently a rage-filled former editor who frustrated himself started a blog, and criticized Rutan Hill yesterday: . Your response? --ColonelHenry (talk) 21:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)


 * He has some relevant points, and I might even modify a few things based on his observations. It's a shame he no longer chooses to contribute.  Lithium6ion (talk) 01:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for attending to this article, I appreciate it. I will try to get up to Wantage in the next week or so to get a picture of the Rutan Hill site.--ColonelHenry (talk) 03:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem. It's interesting... there's actually almost no good pictures of this place anywhere.  I found one decent shot in my searches a while back: http://i48.tinypic.com/qzoec0.jpg  I think it was taken from the corner of Colesville Lusscroft Rd and Neilson Rd, so the view in that picture is of the northeast part of the hill. Lithium6ion (talk) 04:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I live about a half-hour away from there, but it's a tough trek because it's so remote. I take it you're familiar with the area as well? I reached out to the guy who took that photo (he's from the Camden area). He hasn't responded yet. --ColonelHenry (talk) 06:05, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm about an hour out. Do a fair amount of hiking up in that part of the world during the summer. Lithium6ion (talk) 17:55, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:GoffleBrookColor.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GoffleBrookColor.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:LittleDiamondBrookColor.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LittleDiamondBrookColor.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 07:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

looking to redo Kittatinny Mountain
I noticed your contribution to Rutan Hill and wondered if you'd like to add some knowledge on matters geological concerning Kittatinny Mountain. I have been poking around a sandbox draft on my userspace at User:JackTheVicar/sandbox/Box5. If you're able to add something, it would br much appreciated. JackTheVicar (talk) 23:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kings Pond Park


The article Kings Pond Park has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a notable park, fails WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 01:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)