User talk:Lithuanianlady

October 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Donald Gary Young, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Please review the history of editing and do not re-enter content and sources that have already been validly removed. You can go to Talk to discuss these further but you must have WP:CON for editing previously disputed content and sources'' Zefr (talk) 19:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring
You are disputing information that has been repeatedly removed or added and confirmed by other editors at Donald Gary Young. This is WP:WAR and is non-constructive. Please review WP:3RR and discuss controversial content on the article's Talk page. --Zefr (talk) 20:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 20:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Like Zefr, you can avoid a block for violating WP:3RR at Donald Gary Young if you will agree to make no more edits of that article unless there is a prior consensus in your favor on the talk page. See the 3RR noticeboard for details. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:02, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The 3RR complaint has been closed with warnings to both you and User:Zefr. See the result here. You must get prior talk page consensus before making further edits on that article. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)