User talk:Litjade/ 1

Welcome to class
Hi Ejade/Litjade, welcome to class! Contact me should you ever have any questions. Thanks for coming to lab! Visit the class home page anytime to get oriented! -Sara FB (talk) 01:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Snarfa. What's the difference between using Writing Wikipedia Articles: The Basics and Beyond and how you have it in your post here? --Litjade 22:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Litjade! Your link takes you to the place where the 1st (outdated) version of the WIKISOO class materials used to reside. My link takes you directly to the current course materials; you would just have to click a second time where it says "Our new Wikipedia home is here." Is that what you were asking, and does it make sense? - Sara FB (talk) 19:24, 19 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Now I see! Thanks, Snarfa. I thought I heard Peter in class say that WIKISOO is the shortcut to the class page. Maybe he said "was"? --Litjade 21:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)


 * And I can be even more specific... the URL looks different because we moved the class to a different Namespace designed for courses... but you don't need to worry too much about that! - Sara FB (talk) 19:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)


 * So the namespace for class is Education_Program? Anyhoo, copy and paste works fine for me! :) --Litjade 21:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello Teammate
Looking forward to working with you on this interesting course. Glen ggatin (talk) 07:19, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Me, too. Do you prefer to be addressed as Glen or Gating? --Litjade 22:48, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

See you in class!
Hi Litjade, thanks for the great questions in last week's lab session! Looking forward to seeing you in class in a few hours, and hear how your team is coming together. -Pete (talk) 21:54, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi Peter. I can't seem to get into class. ): I followed the Week #2 link and got a download of the Week #1 playback. When I tried opening what I downloaded for Week #1, I got a "not authorized message". What to do, what to do? --Litjade 01:16, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello!
Hello. I'm just leaving a message here. JoelCollins15 (talk) 09:28, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

See you in class?
Hey, hope to see you in class today! -Sara FB (talk) 00:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Final project
I've chosen a specific Orchid article Stub to work on. Phalaenopsis hieroglyphica. Asking our team if anyone is interested in working on it with me.Lorrie (talk) 14:52, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Very cool, Lorrie! I'd be delighted to pitch in!--Litjade 23:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Hope you can make it to the panel today
It's so interesting to hear Wikipedians share their experiences....! See you soon? -Sara FB (talk) 00:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Orchid article
Hi, We will both be learning about this plant - Do you have an idea for structure of the article? I am not good at citing, references, or inserting links, yet. We could start with the basics, where it grows in the wild, taxonomy?, and basic growing/cultural information. Does that sound like too much? Lorrie (talk) 01:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)


 * That sounds like a good plan! The info box is really cool, btw. Is that your work? --Litjade 01:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey both, I noticed this exchange and thought it was exciting. :) You can look at some links like these:
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Layout
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_criteria
 * Also, bring your question about citations to lab on Thursday - Pete showed me a great trick. -Sara FB (talk) 02:06, 5 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Wish the info box was my work. It was there as part of the stub. Thank you, Sara, for the links. I will try to check them out. Linked a Google Images url for the flowers into our article's external links.  Now, all we need to do is figure out how to cite it within the article. The variation of flowers within the species is due to natural hybridation and human intervention. I will look up the plant in our many, many, many (did I say many?) books on orchids. My house mate is the orchidphile, I just live with them in almost every room of the house, including my bedroom. ;)Lorrie (talk) 15:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Lorrie, I have some orchid food, if that helps. :-) Tonight I'll be looking through research papers from this Mendeley search that, I think, Clem shared at last week's lab. From that effort I hope to craft some text with citations. --Litjade 21:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
I left some suggestions at the talk page :)  Go   Phightins  !  01:49, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Go Phightins, for the suggestion and introducing this neat talkback template! --Litjade 02:26, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

I put more info on the talk page for P hieroglyphica
On my way out the door in a few minutes. Hope to 'see' you in class. Lorrie (talk) 23:07, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Answer
In all honesty, I had never seen "general reference" before ... generally speaking, I suppose that would be where you put sources where you draw general information that doesn't need to be cited, necessarily, but don't quote me on that one ... I don't think it's use is widespread at all. Further reading would be where you would list references where one can learn more on a subject (i.e. a book, dedicated website, museum exhibit, etc.), and finally "see also" would be where you could list related Wikipedia articles that are not already linked. I hope this helps; have a nice afternoon.  Go  Phightins  !  16:42, 21 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Ben. That helps a great deal... It goes well with homemade bread and a cuppa as the winds outside promise a thunderstorm show! --Litjade (talk) 16:51, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phalaenopsis hieroglyphica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morphology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry bout the mix-up!
Hi Ejade! So sorry for the gap in communications. Pete is writing an email to suggest a new date! Looking forward to chatting then. :) - Sara FB (talk) 22:50, 21 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Sara, for the heads up. Looking forward! --Litjade (talk) 19:14, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Welcome back to WIKISOO!
Welcome back to the School of Open Writing Wikipedia Articles Class (#WIKISOO)! As you know, your main course page here should be your home page, and please post questions at any time on our TALK page, found at the top left tab of the course page. So glad you signed up again - feel free to offer guidance to your teammates. Please contact me with questions! - Sara FB (talk) 15:32, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey, great idea about the open learning articles
You might want to contact C01Clem about that! It looks relevant to the Open Educational Practices work! - Sara FB (talk) 18:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations on a job well done!
Jade, thank you for taking our class, and congratulations on a job well done! You may want to move this badge to our user page (instead of this talk page). Also, as a badgeholder, you are now able to award the badge to others who earn it. We are already delighted that you are staying around for another round of the course -- hopefully you can help out newer students as you continue to hone your skills! Congratulations, and happy editing! Pete (talk) 17:11, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Pete, for your and Sara's awesome class. I'm not sure about reviewing others' badge submissions, but I'll definitely help out as I can in class! --Litjade (talk) 01:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)


 * You're qualified!!! =Sara FB (talk) 16:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

The Wikipedia Library's Books and Bytes newsletter (#2)
Books & Bytes Sign up for monthly delivery Welcome to the second issue of The Wikipedia Library's Books & Bytes newsletter! Read on for updates about what is going on at the intersection of Wikipedia and the library world. Wikipedia Library highlights: New accounts, new surveys, new positions, new presentations... Spotlight on people: Another Believer and Wiki Loves Libraries...  Books & Bytes in brief: From Dewey to Diversity conference...  Further reading: Digital library portals around the web...   Read Books & Bytes , 16:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Books & Bytes New Years Double Issue
Books & Bytes ''Volume 1 Issue 3, December/January 2013 (Sign up for monthly delivery)'' Happy New Year, and welcome to a special double issue of Books & Bytes. We've included a retrospective on the changes and progress TWL has seen over the last year, the results of the survey TWL participants completed in December, some of our plans for the future, a second interview with a Wiki Love Libraries coordinator, and more. Here's to 2014 being a year of expansion and innovation for TWL!

The Wikipedia Library completed the first 6 months of its Individual Engagement grant last week. Here's where we are and what we've done:
 * Increased access to sources: 1500 editors signed up for 3700 free accounts, individually worth over $500,000, with usage increases of 400-600%
 * Deep networking: Built relationships with Credo, HighBeam, Questia, JSTOR, Cochrane, LexisNexis, EBSCO, New York Times, and OCLC
 * New pilot projects: Started the Wikipedia Visiting Scholar project to empower university-affiliated Wikipedia researchers
 * Developed community: Created portal connecting 250 newsletter recipients, 30 library members, 3 volunteer coordinators, and 2 part-time contractors
 * Tech scoped: Spec'd out a reference tool for linking to full-text sources and established a basis for OAuth integration
 * Broad outreach: Wrote a feature article for Library Journal's The Digital Shift; presenting at the American Library Association annual meeting

...Read Books & Bytes!