User talk:Litraj

Your edits at Articles for Creation
Please stop removing content, sources and review templates from draft articles at Article for Creation, as you did with Fionnuala_Collins, Hans Nordin, Brendan Creaby, Dewey's Pizza, for example. It may not have been your intention, but these edits are disruptive to the process of assessing articles, particularly when you remove review request templates and useful sources. If you want to help at AfC can I suggest you read the Reviewers Instructions and follow these.

A far better solution would be for you to work on other parts of Wikipedia until you have gained a bit of experience. Thankyou. Sionk (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  :- ) Don 00:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, a week ago I was told the listing at SabotageReviews was a good reference for my article, which is why I left it. It is a review site, not a blog. But I will certainly search for replacements for the others. I hope I responded to this correctly!

Teahouse

 * I also added some perspective to that question. -- Jayron  32  03:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Reply to comment at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Literary Juice
Hi Litraj,

You are correct many large newpapers and magazine Blogs are powered by WordPress. That still makes them a blogs. The information does necessarily come under editorial review, and therefore can not be considered reliable. The step beyond this is that sabotagereviews.com is not only powered by WordPress, it is hosted by WordPress, which I believe is a free service. --  :- ) Don 20:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Literary Juice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Zach Vega ( talk to me ) 00:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.
 * Good job. --  :- ) Don 00:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)