User talk:Litte goyary

Ways to improve Alayaron
Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. Litte goyary, thanks for creating Alayaron!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references from independent reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:07, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Bodo singers


The article List of Bodo singers has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Seems an overspecific list article with only three names listed having articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 16:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Bodo singers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Bodo singers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Bodo singers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McGeddon (talk) 17:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Phungja Mushahary


A tag has been placed on Phungja Mushahary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. KarlPopper y (talk) 05:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Regarding Speedy Deletion


 * Hello, Litte goyary. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
 * I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion. 
 * Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into things to avoid or what Wikipedia is not.


 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. 
 * Sometimes articles are deleted because they contain content copyrighted elsewhere . Such content can be used as a source of information, but the content here must be completely rewritten from scratch.
 * Some articles contain material written in a promotional tone. These must often be written from scratch. They are vigorously deleted.
 * Any content that is negative in tone and unsourced or which is disparaging will also be vigorously deleted.
 * Any deficiencies with notability, sourcing, or things to avoid should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.
 * For test edits, click Litte goyary/sandbox
 * If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.
 * You may find this tool useful: Google custom search


 * If you reply to me on your talk page, please place at the beginning of your reply.

If you have verifiable information from reliable sources that show subject does meet notability requirements please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process. . CONTENT IN ARTICLES NEEDS TO BE RELIABLY SOURCED. Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dinananda Shanti Ashram


The article Dinananda Shanti Ashram has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Not notable as per WP:GNG, no coverage in media/press.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — usernamekiran (talk)  07:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gwswm Jwmwi


The article Gwswm Jwmwi has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of any notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lipika Brahma


A tag has been placed on Lipika Brahma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Cahk (talk) 07:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Regarding Speedy Deletion


 * Hello, Litte goyary. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion. See the message above this one for more information about why this was deleted.


 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. 


 * Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.


 * Wikipedia is not a webhost. You may wish to consider alternative outlets.


 * If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.


 * You can make test edits in your sandbox.


 * You may find this tool useful for finding sources: Google custom search


 * Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template  at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

YOU CAN ASK FOR HELP AT THE TEAHOUSE Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:46, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Swapan Kumar Brahma for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swapan Kumar Brahma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Swapan Kumar Brahma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ─  1997 kB  16:49, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Songali
Hello, Litte goyary,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Songali should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Songali.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Gwrbwni Mwdwi
Hello, Litte goyary,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Gwrbwni Mwdwi should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Gwrbwni Mwdwi.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Dilip Basumatary
Hello, Litte goyary,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Dilip Basumatary should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Dilip Basumatary.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Maya (2015 Bodo film)
Hello, Litte goyary,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Maya (2015 Bodo film) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Maya (2015 Bodo film).

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Maya (2015 Bodo film)
Please help to preserve the page.Xx236 (talk) 09:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rega 1986


The article Rega 1986 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable film, only sources provided are blogs, does not meet WP:NF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 14:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nepal To Bodoland


The article Nepal To Bodoland has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable film, no significant coverage by reliable secondary sources, per WP:NF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 22:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Amteka moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Amteka, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:30, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amteka (April 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amteka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amteka, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Amteka Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Amteka reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:06, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Amteka has a new comment
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;width: 100%;"> I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Amteka. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mwdwi


The article Mwdwi has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable film, per WP:NF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 16:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of All Brahma Dharma Committee for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All Brahma Dharma Committee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/All Brahma Dharma Committee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 22:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Khwina


The article Khwina has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable film, does not meet WP:NF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 21:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bihamjw Rani


The article Bihamjw Rani has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, couldn't find any reviews in a WP:BEFORE or anything else, except videos/database entries. Fails WP:NFILM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  13:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gurudev Kalicharan Brahma Academy, Amteka


The article Gurudev Kalicharan Brahma Academy, Amteka has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:MILL institution. Fails WP:NSCHOOL."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:39, 3 March 2022 (UTC)