User talk:LittleBritain1

Next Year. The men's final of Wimbledon will be on the Saturday and the women's final will be on the Sunday onwards.

July 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Total War: Rome II, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

In this edit you replaced the word "difficulties" with "problems". A Google search produced over 3800 sources that gave the wording as "difficulties", and only two that gave "problems", those two being your version of the Wikipedia article and another web page which which had clearly copied from the Wikipedia article. A quote in an article should quote what was actually said or written, not something slightly different that you or i or any other Wikipedia editor would prefer to have been said or written. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Newton Haven, founded by Ebenezer Howard, is a fictitious town in a fictitious film. I assume that you didn't know that, and created the article in good faith, believing that what you wrote was true. However, please be more careful about what you post in Wikipedia articles. Editors who continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:37, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

If you really think that your changes to ESPN Classic (UK) and ESPN America were acceptable, then you have such a poor understanding of English that you really need to stay clear of any attempt to change wording or grammar, because both those changes replaced perfectly good English with nonsense. As for your edit to The World's End (film), it is difficult to see that as anything other than deliberate vandalism, particularly in view of the closely related editing you did at Newton Haven. I gave you the benefit of the doubt there, and assumed it was good-faith but mistaken editing, but there is a limit to how far benefit of the doubt can be extended, and the combined effect of various unhelpful edits raises doubts. Such actions as your attempt to move the article Newton Haven to Newton Haven (actual town) also add to these doubts. If you wish to contribute to the encyclopaedia, then you need to be careful. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:48, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it has become clear that your only purpose in editing Wikipedia is vandalism and trolling. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)