User talk:LittleNirvana

February 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Ipissloyalty", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it contains disruptive reference to urination. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 18:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, Ipissloyalty, does not meet our username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have selected a new username that meets the username policy guidelines, which are summarized below.Per the username policy, a username should represent an individual and should not: represent a group or organization; be promotional; be misleading (such as indicating possession of special user rights or being a "Bot" account (unless approved for such purposes)); be offensive or otherwise disruptive. However, a username that contains the name of a organization and also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87" is allowed, though, among others, the guidance on conflict of interest and the policy of paid-contribution disclosure are relevant.You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
 * Your requested new username cannot already be in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding below this notice. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 20:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

EFFYDESK moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, EFFYDESK, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 17:07, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Royal Match


A tag has been placed on Royal Match requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ~Styyx Talk ? 09:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

"Royal Match (Video game)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Royal Match (Video game) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 23 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Qwerfjkl talk  20:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm AllyD. I noticed that you recently removed content from Joseph Sigelman without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. An edit summary of "Added stub tag" does not adequately describe removing a section of an article, nor should such be marked as a minor edit. AllyD (talk) 18:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orchestrate96 (August 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orchestrate96 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Orchestrate96 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Reading_Beans&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Orchestrate96 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans (talk) 10:27, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orchestrate96 (August 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orchestrate96 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Orchestrate96 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Orchestrate96 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:14, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:EFFYDESK


Hello, LittleNirvana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "EFFYDESK".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:07, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Project Management Training Institute


A tag has been placed on Project Management Training Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk / contribs) 02:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Dislcosure required
221.125.142.225 (talk) 09:16, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, User:221.125.142.225, I have not been paid/compensated for any edits that I make on Wikipedia. LittleNirvana (talk) 18:12, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Compensation can also be "indirect", such as being an employee of the company that develops the game. Your edits suggest you are one, since you uploaded all the Royal Match screenshots to Commons with permission. If not, then it should be explained why you created the Royal Match article despite the dearth of reliable sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:21, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't work for the company in any way. I got the screenshot from playing the game on my mobile phone. LittleNirvana (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If it is the case that you took the screenshots (and it seems it is), then somehow they got approved for use in Wikipedia Commons with verified email from the developer themselves, which implies you are said developer. If not, how exactly did said copyright approval come to pass? ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Royal Match


The article Royal Match has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Seems very promotional, sources are very closely related to Dream Games, the developer. In my opinion, doesn't meet WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JML1148 (Talk &#124; Contribs) 00:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Slowdog


A tag has been placed on Slowdog, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slowdog. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:49, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Slowdog for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slowdog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Slowdog& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:30, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text  at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must: GeneralNotability (talk) 21:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
 * State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
 * Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francis Najafi (September 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francis Najafi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Francis_Najafi Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Akevsharma&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Francis_Najafi reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 00:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Centre for Heritage, Arts and Textile moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Centre for Heritage, Arts and Textile, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  08:32, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centre for Heritage, Arts and Textile (September 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Centre for Heritage, Arts and Textile and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Centre_for_Heritage,_Arts_and_Textile Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chris_troutman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Centre_for_Heritage,_Arts_and_Textile reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman ( talk ) 12:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)