User talk:LittleOldMe/Archive1

Thanks for the Friendly Welcome
Thanks the friendly welcome, and for the tips/links, which I'll read. Bstct 22:37, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the Welcome
Thanks for the welcome... I already know all the crap and actually have contributed a lot but my IP changes so its impossible to track... Well... just wanted to say thanks anyways.

Heads up!
Please take a moment to look up the true meaning of the term "vandalism." Unfairly targeting a single user's contributions will make you a nuisance and an enemy on this site very quickly. 192.150.115.150 16:36, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Response to 192.150.115.150
I apologise for reverting your edits that were correct. I am aware of vandalism and I have familiarised myself with the definitions and the guidlines regarding the reporting thereof. I had no intention of singling you out for attack. I wish to offer in my defense that there were other changes made from the IP address that were vandalism.

May I suggest that you register as a user so that you are not linked to other individuals who use the IP address for vandalism.

Once more, I apologise for my mistake, I have only good intentions.

LittleOldMe 16:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Username
I'd suggest using Changing username since the old username is visible at "What links here". Best, feydey 10:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page yesterday. EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME 21:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Storming of the Bastille on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Ziusudra 16:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied to Ziusudra's talk page.
 * Sorry for the collision. I suspect it it may have been due to a bug in VandalProof, since I ended up with my Watchlist being wildly corrupted.
 * --Ziusudra 17:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Your Comment sent to me
Hello, I'm sorry if this isn't the appropriate way to contact you, Littleoldme, but I am having problems navigating this site at present. I wasn't logged in when I reported some grafitti on the Captain Cook page. I was NOT responsible for the grafitti but you sent me this:

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. LittleOldMe 13:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I find it very upsetting that you considered me responsible for writing Captain Cook sucks cocks or whatever the graffiti said. I was merely pointing it out as I do not like to directly alter wiki pages myself as it is someone else's work and I could wrong about my observations.

I also feel my comment about 'discovery' being a contentious word to be a fair one and by removing my comment you intend to restrict my freedom of speech.

I acknowledge I was not logged in when I left the comment on the captain Cook talk page but my point still stands. If you remove any more of my comments from any pages or send me similar messages indicating I am a 'vandal' I will make a complaint to wikipedia properly.

Thank you for reading this.

Elise Pageantmalarkey 13:58, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied to User talk:Pageantmalarkey

Cheers
Thanks for clearing that up for me! Have a great week.

Elise

Vandalism warnings on my talk page
Thank you for reverting the addition of vandalism warnings to my talk page by User:216.7.254.254. I appreciate your taking the time to assist in this way. Regards, User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 00:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Question
Is there a reason why you are reverting my talk page back to display my old personal messages? I don't see the need to keep old comments... 66.246.72.108 16:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on user's talk page

Userpage thanks
Thanks for the vandalism revert on my userpage! NawlinWiki 16:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Veblen goods
Hi, I noticed you moved Veblen good to Veblen goods, all the other good articles are singular, and my econ dictionary is singular as well. So either the move needs to be reversed or the other articles need to be moved as well. thanks Martin 08:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Replied on Martin's talk page


 * I would never discourage being bold, and I don't even feel strongly that the article should be plural or singular, all I really want is for the articles to all use the same name. Let's see if anyone else has anything to say. thanks Martin 10:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Re vandalism
Sorry if I did not follow the proper protocol for warning messages. Does this protocol apply to all cases? In re user user:213.164.102.137, he or she put the f-word into the article Valdas Adamkus and left it there. Sometimes it's hard to wait for a bot to come along and fix it. And it can be hard to see the polite first warning message in cases like that. However, I will abide by the system if you say that's the standard even in those instances. Sincerely, Novickas 11:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification. Novickas 16:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Help me
How does one remove an article from a category. The term "Collective good (Social good)" is listed at the bottom of articles that belong to the category "goods" (such as durable goods). However, Collective good belongs to the categories Stubs, Community building, Core issues in ethics, Value and Philosophical terminology. LittleOldMe 13:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You can remove categories by removing the line that says .  However, the article you linked to is not in the category Goods.  Can you show me where you see this?  -- Merope Talk 13:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh! That's a template for a category, gotcha.  Is it better now?  You fix it by going to the appropriate template (in this case, located at Template:Goodtypes -- Merope Talk 14:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Zero tolerance policy to vandalism
No doubt, but one has to be careful, in making assumptions about vandalism. The removal of the first para on Church architecture was no doubt peremptory but the para itself could be argued to be a little pompous Roger Arguile 14:38, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Replied on Roger Arguile's talk page

Olde English 800
I'm not sure why you reverted my edit, calling it vandalism. N.W.A does indeed have a song called "8 Ball" and it does indeed talk about this beverage. It's a good song you should check it out. But next time, do a little fact checking before you write something off immediately as vandalism.Jigsaw Jimmy 01:55, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi Jimmy, I did revert your edit, but nowhere did I call it vandalism. I saw that DJ Quik's 8 Ball was already listed and assumed that the NWA version was a cover, and thus a duplication. It was remiss of me not to give an adequate reason in the summary or on the talk page, and for this I apologise. LittleOldMe 10:11, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Sanctification
Hi LittleOldMe,

I just noticed the message you left on my talk page. I can understand that some people would consider the edits of the user in question to be "good faith", but in my opinion they were unnecessary and just plain vandalism. I could even throw in a POV issue too, but I won't. Anyway, just thought I'd let you know my reasons for making the revert. Thanks for your concern :)

TeraByte 07:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

the anonymous avenger
OK, I'll start signing. Thanks for acknowledging my efforts. Gzuckier 14:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Cesar Chavez
Thank you for the revision to Cesar Chavez. How can people actually think stating Cesar Chavez was a mexican american is vandalism? I don't get it. 67.162.212.254 19:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply on user's talk page.
 * There have been repeated attempts by (apparently) various users (including the IP address who "thanked" you, above) to revise the wiki policy manual (always in the same poorly-written phraseology) to "allow" race and sexual orientation to be cited in the opening paragraph. That's what this is about. Wahkeenah 23:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied to Wahkeenah's talk page
 * I apologize if I got you wrong. You have apparently stumbled into a hot-button issue. User Cliesthenes, along with some newly (and briefly) registered users, as well as several IP addresses (such as the anon signer at the top of this paragraph), had been identified by User Dcflyer as sockpuppets of each other, as per my comments above. Wahkeenah 11:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Apology Accepted LittleOldMe 12:20, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Three-revert rule
I have been following discussions in regards to the César Chávez and Lance Bass edit wars, and it seems common practice to assert that anyone who makes three reverts has broken the three-revert rule.

However, the way I read it, three reverts are permitted without contravening the rule.

I ask because earlier in the day I reverted vandalism to the deafness article three times believing that I was permitted to do so.

Can you clarify please?

LittleOldMe 20:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi, In the 3RR rule, three reverts or more (in 24 hours) are permitted in the case of obvious vandalism, but not for any form of edit warring (unless against clear vandalism). See WP:3RR for further details, or post the again. Hope I've helped to clear it up for you :)  M  a  rtinp23  21:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism 70.98.73.2
Hi user at ip 70.98.73.2 is on a vandalism spree (see  etc) Noticed that you've already warned them but the page count is three and rising so I thought you might be the person to take things the next step. Cheers--Saganaki- 13:01, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on user's talk page. LittleOldMe 13:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

The Free Wholesale Directory & IDIM Business advertising, spam article
This article, The Free Wholesale Directory & IDIM, appears to be blatant business advertising/spamming. Obvious language aside, the wikpedia username of the main contributor also appears used in the html of the external links. Wondered if you could take action? Cheers --Saganaki- 04:31, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on user's talk page. LittleOldMe 15:14, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Great when it all just happens. Cheers --Saganaki- 12:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Zola Budd Image
Please see my reply on the talk page. --Portnadler 16:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Rename
While you're too late for me to complete your rename request, you can simply request it again - just post from this account, and confirm from User:RichBerry that you also have control of that account - I'll be happy to change your name. Warofdreams talk 15:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

OK
Ah, I hadn't realised that page was open edit, so the recent changes list looked like a conversation, not just a test edit. TimVickers 17:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome Message
Erm...you left a welcome message to "Rickmark" on my talk page. I guess that was some mistake...Anyway, thanks for the welcome message and stuff... AMP&#39;d 20:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the barnstar! I love it. Have a good day. -- Kf4bdy talk contribs 11:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcoming
Your kind welcome, and its gentle nudge to area's of assistance, was greatly appreciated. JosephLenard 11:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Username change
In your request you wrote "LittleOldMe" bot after "Current name:" and "Requested name:". Based on the section header, I have corrected this. I left a note in case this was not the intended correction. In brief, it was just copyediting. Tizio, Caio, Sempronio 12:30, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
I cannot take full credit for the welcome, as various users have helped in its development. I am just happy to see people taking time to let other newcomers know how and where to find things in wikipedia so they may choose to become valuable members of our community. Happy editing, Kukini 15:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Rename
As requested, I have renamed you as User:LittleOldMe and have moved that account to User:LittleOldMe old. Warofdreams talk 02:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thankyou very much for the nice warm welcome, DuO 11:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the welcome. EH74DK 11:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Question
Just a quick question, when I am reverting vandalism and such - if the person has no talk page, what would the appropritate action to take (as to how to warn them)? Thanks In Advance, DuO 11:59, 20 October 2006 (UTC)


 * There is no hard and fast rule, but the guidelines encourage you to be nice. For IP addresses that vandalise I generally use the template {{subst:Welcomeip}} followed by a {{subst:test1}} or a {{subst:test1a}} warning message. In general, registered users do not tend to vandalise, but they often add biased material, which once removed, the {{subst:welcomenpov}} is ideal for. There is also one for unsuitable external links {{subst:Welcomespam}}.


 * There is quite a lot of information on the subject, so don't feel overwhelmed, start with the few that I have provided and as you become more comfortable you can expand your tool set.


 * Regards


 * LittleOldMe 12:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

MTV
Why am I unable to revert the vandalism on the MTV article?

LittleOldMe 16:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)


 * You have reverted it successfully - maybe you need to force the page to reload (shift/crtl/reload button) so it does not take from cache? --Lethaniol 17:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) Your most recent revert (using popups) looked like a perfectly fine vandalism revert to me. What do you think went wrong? (Put the helpme tag back up when you reply to the question, so Wikipedians will know to check back.) --ais523 17:02, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Warnings
Please be a bit more careful when giving warnings. If you notice in the Jeet Kune Do artical, I readded the article back, didn't delete it. -Brainyiscool —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brainyiscool (talk • contribs)
 * Yeah, I think it was a slow pop-ups revert. The vandalism was added in this change.  Budgiekiller 17:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on Brainyiscool's talk page. LittleOldMe 18:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

re: Slow blocks
There are times of the day (like early morning in the US) when things tend to pile up because not that many admins are online. I don't usually work on AIV, but I just happened to notice that several items were lingering in there so I cleared it out. I guess we need more good admin candidates that are online at this time of day and willing to clear out AIV :) -- Aguerriero  ( talk ) 14:20, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy delete and "biting the newcomers"
I appreciate your message, though I am a little unclear as to the reason for it. Are you responding to something I recently tagged for deletion, or were you speaking in a more general sense? The tag you referred to is not familiar to me, but I always enjoy learning new things. Thanks. ---Charles 15:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The reason for the message is that I had an edit conflict on an article that you had tagged for speedy deletion and I noticed that there was no message placed on the user's talk page. However, the tag you used unfortunately does not add the template message, which is something I never knew. The one I quoted is from the  tag. I'm sorry if the original message appeared a bit preachy (I re-read it and got that sense from it) but it was never my intention. Perhaps it is because I am still finding my way around Wikipedia that I feel sympathy for the newcomers who are being encouraged to be bold on the one hand but are often unsympathetically brushed aside when they attempt to contribute.


 * Regards


 * LittleOldMe 15:20, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Fear not, because I detected no "preachy tone" in the message. Which article was it that I tagged for speedy deletion?  I am more than willing to admit that I make mistakes, and am certainly willing to reexamine any decision I have made if you feel I was in error.  It is funny that you should leave this message, actually, because I was having a discussion (here: []) about this very dichotomy---the urge to delete articles that appear to be useless and nonsensical versus the equally valid desire not to offend and scare off new editors who may become useful contributors.  It is a balancing act in which I often fail in my equilibrium. ---Charles 15:31, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

It has been my pleasure meeting you, sir. I look forward to future agreement, disagreement, and polite discussion as we continue this rather Quixotic project we have all undertaken together. Cheers! ---Charles 19:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy
Hi. I've replied to your comment on my user page, but just to gain a bit of concensus - do you always put warnings on user pages? I tend not to do it with people whose sole aim (it appears) is to 1. Register, and 2. Create an article about themselves/their company. Sometimes I have pangs of "benefit of the doubt", but it is hard sometimes. All part of the learning process, I suppose. It was vandalism reverts for me last week, but since I got "pop-ups", it's taken the fun out of it! So I turned my hand to speedies. A lot harder because you have to think more and sometimes you make rash decisions. Like to hear your views. :) Bubba hotep 10:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
I noticed that you tagged the page Image:Shnafflehund pup.jpg for speedy deletion with the reason "This image is redundant because it was used on a nonsense article now deleted". However, "This image is redundant because it was used on a nonsense article now deleted" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use WP:IFD if you still want the page to be deleted. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 18:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

196.2.124.251
Hi - I've just added a vandalism warning to User talk:196.2.124.251, and noticed a last warning template above it, issued by you. Thought I ought to let you know - D B DR 13:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Inappropriate Vandal Warning
Thank you for bringing This diff to my attention. I don't even remember leaving this warning, and in any case I doubt I actually meant for it to save. In any case, I've corrected it to an appropriate template. I apologise for any offense. --NMChico24 23:26, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome
Dear friend, let me thank you for the warm (and immediate) welcome. Dr Moshe 10:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks mate!
It was really good to hear from you... I'm just seeing what I can do! --Cofie 11:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Sock puppetry
I have come across user:MarkTehBetter who also edits under user:TehBettor

I attempted to report this on Suspected sock puppets but nothing shows up.

Have I done this correctly?

LittleOldMe 11:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No, you have not done it correctly. The 8 step process is clearly laid out on the above page. Please do it step by step and you will get it. If you get stuck at any stage, please let me know on my talk page or post a message at the talk page of Suspected sock puppets. -- Lost (talk) 11:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for welcoming me
Hope to see you around!--R613vlu 12:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome
Thanks for you advice, I hadn't realised about the edit summary. --Chris Buttigieg 21:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: No Barnstar yet
Thanks for the barnstar. I've only been at this for a little while but encouragement always helps. Gdo01 05:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Hi(PNI 13:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC))

Asking for help
Dear friend, I was wondering whether you could help me. The template en-4 appears twice on my userpage and I cannot understand why it is so. Have I done something (mysteriously :)) wrong? Your help will be appreciated. Dr Moshe 11:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Re:Welcomes on userpage
I'm well aware that welcomes/warnings should go on talk; that's the second time I've made that mistake (through not noticing I'm on the wrong page, not through ignorance). I've corrected it now; thanks for noticing and pointing it out. --ais523 16:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)