User talk:Little Flower Eagle

Your question
You'll find the answer (and your question) here. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Your question
Hi. I found your question and answered it. It had got stuck to someone else's question because you didn't make a new section for it - you can do that by putting two =s on each side of it like so:

== Section title ==

or clicking the 'new section' tab at the top of the page. Hope that helps! Olaf Davis (talk) 16:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Original barnstar
A couple tips: according to the Wikipedia Manual of Style, we don't capitalize words after the first word in section headings unless they're proper nouns. I've noticed you've been handwriting citations. I do this too sometimes, but when citing PubMed-indexed or scholarly articles, you can use Diberri's tool to generate the ref based on the PMID. You can also explore Verisimilus' version of Google Scholar, which will automatically generate references. It's a bit buggy sometimes, but it can be a nice start. I usually collapse the references so they don't take up so much space. Good luck. Also, check out WP:MEDRS. Review articles are preferred and you might find people removing focused original research articles. If you're having trouble accessing a paper, I can try looking it up since I have access to a couple academic databases (none medicine-focused, though). You can also try WP:LIBRARY. Let me know if you need help. II | (t - c) 18:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Good idea re: proposed edit to yoga as exercise article
Hi Little Flower,

I was just looking thro the yoga as ex article discussion, and saw that you proposed doing some work on it, such as possibly removing the ref to naked yoga in favor of mentioning more significant groups. I not only do not object, but encourage you to do that! Best of luck with it. 99.240.234.199 (talk) 15:21, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Oops, make that Early morning person (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)