User talk:Littlebirdie1

Reliable sources
Please have a read of our guideline on reliable sourcing on Wikipedia. In particular, self published sites such as blogs are not reliable, and recordings of interviews are primary sources and should best be avoided. It is best to stick to published books, peer reviewed journals, newspapers and the like. - MrOllie (talk) 17:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
MrOllie (talk) 03:36, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Regarding one of your changes
Hello. The change you made was reverted because Wikipedia requires a link to a WP:Reliable source, and the Los Angeles Times is considered to be one of them. Best wishes, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:51, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Please sign your contributions
Hello. I've noticed that you have not been signing your contributions. This lack of WP:Competence causes problems for the other Wikipedians. Please sign all your comments on WP:Userpages by striking the tilde key four times at the end of your posting. That's not too hard and will help everybody out. Thank you. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 01:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Keitrt&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Keitrt. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your help desk question
Not sure whether this is helpful for you at this time but you have [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2021_March_25#How_do_you_determine_spam? a response].— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  23:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)