User talk:Littlekitty123456789

November 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Twilight (Meyer novel) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Twilight (Meyer novel) was changed by Littlekitty123456789 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95416 on 2015-11-30T21:23:58+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harry Potter. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Harry Potter was changed by Littlekitty123456789 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.992579 on 2015-11-30T21:27:09+00:00.

While we appreciate your desire to share your love of Harry Potter with other readers, Wikipedia is not the best place to do this. Imagine if every time you went to a Wikipedia article, you found a comment like yours every other sentence. That's how Wikipedia would be if edits like your last one were not reverted. It would be very difficult to find factual information if Wikipedia became like that. That's why we can't allow edits like that. Please don't take it personally or anything, it's just part of how Wikipedia works. I reccomend you take the Wikipedia Adventure to learn more aboutnwhat kinds of edits we do want. If you have any question, please send me a message on my talk page. Happy editing, BlAcKhAt9(9 (talk) 21:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * P.S. I'm sending you a welcome message with some information about editing Wikipedia and a link to the Wikipedia Adventure.

You're invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
You're invited to the Wikipedia Adventure, a fun and interactive way to learn how to edit Wikipedia in less than an hour! I strongly reccomend this for all new editors (I wish I had used it when I started editing). As always, feel free to message me on my talk page with any questions! (Don't worry if you don't know what a talk page is - you'll learn it in the adventure!) Happy editing! BlAcKhAt9(9 (talk) 21:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.   If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: . Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)