User talk:Littleoldmanandball

Neil N  talk to me 05:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)}}

June 2016
Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jesus in Islam without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Neil N  talk to me 03:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jesus in Islam, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 04:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * To reinforce this, continued deletion of material without explanation will probably result in blocks. --Neil N  talk to me 04:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Jesus in Islam, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 04:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sro23 (talk) 04:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

You need to wait for others to reply to your post. --Neil N  talk to me 04:42, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Blocked
This account has been blocked as an illegitimate sockpuppet of User:Obaidullah_ak. You need to appeal the block under your original account, Obaidullah_ak. Until then, you are not welcome here no matter what account or IP address you use. You, as a person, are not allowed to edit while the block on your original account remains in place.

If you think this is a mistake, you can appeal this block by reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:

Ian.thomson (talk) 04:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
<div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. <b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 05:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)