User talk:Liturgy

Edit warring on Edmond Paris
G'day Liturgy, and welcome to Wikipedia (as a registered user at any rate). A couple of things you should be aware of off the bat. Firstly, a good starting point on your path to productive editing is to read WP:BRD, which explains that editors should be bold and make edits, and if reverted, go to the talk page of the article in question to discuss the matter with the editor that reverted. So, this edit was you boldly changing the categorisation, and this was me reverting your changes. What you should have done then was start a thread on the article talk page to discuss the basis of your edit. Instead, you reverted my reversion. This is called edit-warring, and it is not only frowned on at WP, it can result in you being blocked from editing. So, the right thing to do in this circumstance would be to self-revert your reversion, and start a thread on the article talk page, using reliable sources to back up your views. I hope you choose that course of action. Regards, and again, welcome. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 06:23, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ambrosios-Aristotelis Zografos


A tag has been placed on Ambrosios-Aristotelis Zografos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ec-patr.org/hierarchs/show.php?lang=en&id=166. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  13:27, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of hybrid creatures in mythology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Needle ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_hybrid_creatures_in_mythology check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_hybrid_creatures_in_mythology?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

St. Nicholas Cathedral (Seoul) moved to Draft:St. Nicholas Cathedral (Seoul)
Hi, Greetings. Pls note that your creation of St. Nicholas Cathedral (Seoul) has been moved toDraft:St. Nicholas Cathedral (Seoul). Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see


 * 1) reliable source - see WP:RS
 * 2) primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
 * 3) verification - see WP:V
 * 4) notability - see WP:N
 * 5) webcite - see  WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Copying licensed material requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Pope Pius XII foreign relations after World War II you included material from a webpage that is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Denniss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Airbus A330 MRTT have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Denniss (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

St. Nicholas Cathedral (Seoul) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, St. Nicholas Cathedral (Seoul), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:22, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Korean dragon into Dragon. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:45, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Americans in South Korea moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Americans in South Korea, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 16:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Update to the map of Eastern Orthodoxy
Hello! I saw you had updated. Could you update it again to add the "Orthodox Church of Ukraine (Ukrainian Orthodox Church)"? Veverve (talk) 02:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Americans in South Korea


Hello, Liturgy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Americans in South Korea".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Interstellarity (talk) 18:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:St. Nicholas Cathedral (Seoul) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:St. Nicholas Cathedral (Seoul), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:St. Nicholas Cathedral (Seoul)


Hello, Liturgy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "St. Nicholas Cathedral".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Legoland Korea Resort moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Legoland Korea Resort, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  07:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Your edit to Legoland Korea Resort has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 11:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of Catholic basilicas
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Catholic basilicas, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Liturgy&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1210184260 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Catholic_basilicas&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1210184260%7CList%20of%20Catholic%20basilicas%5D%5D Ask for help])