User talk:Liu1126/Archive 1

Psychologists
Regarding your edit summary in this edit, it's not true that "Psychologist already implies he's an academic"; various kinds of applied psychologists are not academics but are psychologists. Your edit is fine, but a better reason for it would be that it's shorter, not that all psychologists are academics! Biogeographist (talk) 15:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Ah yes, I didn't realize that at the time of the edit. Thanks! Liu1126 (talk) 20:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Wikidata descriptions
Hi! I've seen this edit and wanted to ask why the Wikidata description has been overriden here. I've seen this from other editors in other places too and I always thought that Wikidata descriptions would be preferable to local descriptions (because, why have them when they are not used?), but I'm curious to know why this may be a wrong assumption. Thank you. -- Evilninja (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Short descriptions are usually less than 40 characters long and are required to be easily understandable to the layman. Wikidata descriptions don't follow these requirements, so they are often too long or technical to be imported as a short description. See Short descriptions for more info.
 * In this specific case, however, the Wikidata description is actually acceptable, and has been used on other pages, like Milli-, but on a whim of the moment, and before consulting the other pages, I decided that adding "SI" to the start of the description would "greatly improve its quality" (as you can see, editing short descriptions, especially those for scientific and engineering articles, is a very arbitrary process). In hindsight, though, it seems that the addition of "SI" is unnecessary jargon and does nothing but waste three characters, so... minor trout slap? (and I've sneakily removed the characters from the short description) Liu1126 (talk) 21:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks for the explanation, I did not know about the constraints on Short Descriptions. Declaring "SI" as "unnecessary jargon" might anger some physics nerds, but I get what you mean :-) Thanks for taking the time to respond! -- Evilninja (talk) 12:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Question from Priyanshuguptaa (17:01, 25 September 2023)
Hello i am an fashion influencer or influencer marketing specialist --Priyanshuguptaa (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm afraid your question isn't clear. Ask me any questions you have about editing Wikipedia. Liu1126 (talk) 17:06, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

IP annoyance
It's an LTA, and this specific IP is fresh off a block for it. I re-blocked. DMacks (talk) 13:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Good block, thank you! Liu1126 (talk) 14:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from Samente (20:49, 6 October 2023)
Hello please can you help me see pictures of architecture --Samente (talk) 20:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! If you are just looking for images, you may want to look on Wikimedia commons, specifically its architecture category. You can look through the images inside the category itself, or go into one of its subcategories. Alternatively, you can browse Portal:Architecture, which contains many Wikipedia articles on architecture, in which you may also find images. If you are looking for something very specific, you may find help at our humanities reference desk. Note that many images on Commons and Wikipedia are licensed under various Creative Commons licenses, which have specific requirements regarding their usage. Have a good day! Liu1126 (talk) 14:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from Richardjulius22 (07:24, 7 October 2023)
Hello,can I link my wikipedia to my Facebook page --Richardjulius22 (talk) 07:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm afraid I am not exactly sure of what you mean. If you mean whether you can put something on your Facebook page about you editing Wikipedia, sure! If you mean you want to put a link on your userpage to your Facebook page or copy content over from your Facebook page, then that is most likely not allowed. Wikipedia user pages are mainly aimed to assist in collaboration between editors. They may host a small amount of autobiographical material (such as the userboxes on my user page), but excessive personal material not related to your work on Wikipedia is not allowed, as it unnecessarily consumes server space and sometimes may seem inappropriate or even offensive to other editors. For more information, please see User pages. Have a good day! Liu1126 (talk) 14:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from KunoichiWiki4 (11:48, 9 October 2023)
Hello Liu1126, thank you for being my mentor! I occasionally use Wikipedia in my particular areas of interest, particularly U.S. and Japanese science fiction and Japanese manga comics (having published my own SF and translated lots of Japanese SF and hundreds of Japanese manga comics). I was particularly the translator of the Japanese SF writer Yamano Koichi who was one of my mentors. I am interested in increasing the amount of information in English on Mr. Yamano (now deceased, with no English language entry) and to expand entries on translated Japanese manga where I see that works I translated have been attributed to other people. There is no actual item for me on Wikipedia, not even a short one to the effect: "Dana Lewis is a translator of Japanese manga and science fiction and a  Science Fiction Writers of America  and Science Fiction Writers of Japan." (both of which have Wikipedia entries). I realize this is ego driven (!) but I see multiple Wikipedia entries attributing translations I did to other people, perhaps because there is no entry for me that can be linked to. What is the policy at Wikipedia in this situation? Am I allowed to create a short entry about myself as above, or must if be created by a 3rd party? Also (Somewhat!) less egocentrically), I see entries pertaining to Japanese SF writers and manga artists I know personally  that does not mention their work is available in English translation, by me or by other translators (who no doubt should  in turn have their own entries to keep things straight). Can I create entries myself to address these gaps? --KunoichiWiki4 (talk) 11:48, 9 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for taking the time to ask me about this. It sounds like you may have a conflict of interest (COI) with some of the articles and content areas you would like to work on. Wikipedia policy defines COI as "contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships".
 * Everyone has potential COIs to some degree, even myself, and the rules about COI are by no means meant to prevent you from contributing to Wikipedia. Not everyone declares their COIs because it would be cumbersome to do so and it usually isn't necessary, but since you want to make a significant amount of contributions to areas you have COIs in, there are several actions you would need to take and follow:
 * Firstly, you would need to declare your COIs on your user page using the the templates Template:Connected contributor or Template:UserboxCOI. You can follow the instructions on the template pages. This helps other editors know if you are making edits in your COI area.
 * Secondly, you should put any articles you create that are in your COI area through Articles for Creation. This is a process where more experienced editors can review your creations and either create the article for you if it is ready for publication, or provide feedback if it is not. As a new editor, you will have to use this process anyway, but even after you achieve autoconfirmed status, you will still need to use this process to create articles in your COI area to allow uninvolved editors to confirm that your new articles are neutrally written.
 * Thirdly, you should refrain from editing articles in your COI area. Instead, you should suggest edits on the article's talk page using Template:Edit COI. Uninvolved editors will respond to your suggestions and either accept them and edit the article for you or refuse them.
 * Finally, you should create articles and suggest edits in line with Wikipedia's various policies. Of course, there are an incredible amount of policies, and it is unlikely that you will be able to quickly read and understand all of them. Don't worry, we're here to help! You can ask me any specific questions on editing, or request help at the Teahouse. There are some specific guidelines I would suggest you read right now, though. The first is notability. You mentioned that you and other translators do not have articles. Of course, this may be due to an oversight, but it is also possible that you weren't determined "notable" enough. Although there is no hard and fast rule to what is notable or not, generally speaking, you would need several secondary sources about yourself to be deemed notable. The second is verifiability. All claims on Wikipedia need to be supported by secondary sources, which are usually placed as inline citations. When adding information, you would need to take note of this.
 * Sorry for the very long answer. I would encourage you to read WP:COI and other Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Have a good day! Liu1126 (talk) 13:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from MancosMustanger on Mancos, Colorado (17:54, 15 October 2023)
Hi there. Trying to add event, “Mancos BurroFest in late June” to the page for Mancos, CO.

Cannot see full text of the page, only first paragraph after stats. Thanks. --MancosMustanger (talk) 17:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! I believe you're saying you can only see the infobox and the lead section? Usually this is because you clicked the [edit] or [edit source] link that is right next to the page title, which only opens the lead section for editing (although this option should be disabled by default, so I'm not quite sure why you're seeing it).
 * To edit the whole page, there is an "Edit" or "Edit source" button that is in the bar under the title. The button in the right half of the bar and sandwiched between the "Read" and the "View history" buttons. You can also edit a specific section of the article by clicking the [edit] or [edit source] links that appear next to the section headers.
 * When editing content on Wikipedia, make sure that the statements you add are verifiable; that is, they are supported by reliable sources. I would encourage you to read the two articles I have linked and other policies and guidelines. Have a good day! Liu1126 (talk) 21:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from RAYANAYOUNGSTARREYNOLDS (12:09, 16 October 2023)
I've posted my pictures and published them now I can't see anything --RAYANAYOUNGSTARREYNOLDS (talk) 12:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello. The files you uploaded have not been lost. They were uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. You can find you files at your contributions on Commons.
 * However, I must warn you about the images you have uploaded and any future images you may want to upload. Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Any files uploaded to Commons must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. There is a minor exception in that a limited number of images of yourself that you are using on your user page would be allowed, but I have doubts over whether the images you have uploaded would be acceptable under this provision.
 * Although I will not nominate your images for deletion, I would recommend that you request speedy deletion under criteria G7 while still possible, as other editors may come across your files and nominate them for deletion instead. Thank you. Liu1126 (talk) 15:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Why what's wrong with them? RAYANAYOUNGSTARREYNOLDS (talk) 17:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't see my profile being visible I can't find it when I Google why? RAYANAYOUNGSTARREYNOLDS (talk) 17:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * For your first question, simply because they are not useful, at least for now, to the project. Wikimedia Commons is meant to provide educational media content to the public, educational being defined as "providing knowledge; instructional or informative". Unless you are a well known public figure that meets Wikipedia's notability requirements, it is unlikely that many people (other than your friends and family) would find photos of yourself useful.
 * For your second question, Wikipedia user pages are almost always ignored by search engines like Google, since they don't contain any content of interest to the general public. If you want to create an article about yourself, you will need to make sure that it meets the various policies and guidelines such as verifiability and notability, and also use the WP:AFC method since you have a conflict of interest. Liu1126 (talk) 22:54, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll be soon Ryan Reynolds wife and will have some movies coming in can we make it seen by the public? RAYANAYOUNGSTARREYNOLDS (talk) 23:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If your husband is the Canadian/American actor Ryan Reynolds, then I'm sure there's nothing to worry about, since there are many editors interested in him and his work, so any new films by him should be quickly updated on his article (although his article does state that his wife has been Blake Lively since 2012...).
 * Otherwise, you will have to first prove the notability of your husband and yourself, or the notability of the films. To quote the relevant guideline: "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." If you believe you, your husband, and/or the films meet these requirements, you will still have to follow the procedures on conflict of interest editing.
 * Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. It is an unbiased collection of educational information for the general public, not the world's biggest billboard. If you want to promote yourself or other interests, you would benefit more from contacting a public relations agency. Thank you. Liu1126 (talk) 11:23, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll hire a person to put the content for me once we announce it! RAYANAYOUNGSTARREYNOLDS (talk) 11:35, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I would not recommend that. Paid editing is still a type of conflict of interest. Consequently, paid editors are also prohibited from directly editing content relating to you.
 * Besides, if the content you want to add meets Wikipedia's policies, you can propose the edits yourself, and uninvolved editors will add the content for you. If it doesn't meet the policies and guidelines, the content will likely be removed even if it was added by an editor clandestinely editing for you, as it has happened many times in the past, resulting in only wasted time and money. Liu1126 (talk) 11:47, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * professionals will add it in a very professional way the way it won't be removed ever! RAYANAYOUNGSTARREYNOLDS (talk) 11:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, we shall see about that. Otherwise, I don't see this conversation going anywhere productive. I would suggest that you stop wasting your time on this thread. Liu1126 (talk) 13:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * yeah I don't see you being helpful Goodbye! RAYANAYOUNGSTARREYNOLDS (talk) 13:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (Archive link)
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Delete a wiki page created by some nuisance person. Thank you. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). 11:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Discussion for Saqlain Miyan Wiki Page
Hi Liu, Did you created the page ? Toufeeq690 (talk) 12:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)


 * No, if you look at the page history, the original creator of the page is QuadriSyedSahab. Liu1126 (talk) 12:14, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from Siddheshd2811 (08:19, 28 October 2023)
Hi Liu,

I hope you are doing well.

I am interested in publishing the details of my book on Wikipedia, and I was wondering if you could kindly assist me with a step-by-step guide to ensure a successful creation of a Wikipedia page for my book. I have found a reference that seems to align with my requirements, which you can see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_Can%27t_Win_(book)

Thank you very much for your help. --Siddheshd2811 (talk) 08:19, 28 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! There are detailed instructions on Help:Your first article, but I'll give you a brief outline here, especially since there will be some extra steps you'll need to take due to your conflict of interest.
 * Make sure that your book meets Wikipedia's general notability guidelines or the notability guidelines specific to books. To summarise (although you should also check the two linked pages above), your book should have been covered by several reliable sources or has had a significant impact in the literature community. There is also a threshold standard for books: you book must have been catalogued by your country's official or de facto national library (e.g. Library of Congress for US books, British Library for UK books, etc.). Failing this threshold almost always means the book is not notable enough for inclusion, although exceptions do exist.
 * Create your article in your user space or the draft space. There are several policies and guidelines you will need to follow, the most important of which are the Manual of Style, which details how the page should be structured and written, and Verifiability, which states that all claims in articles must be supported by reliable sources.
 * You should also declare your conflict of interest at this stage by using the on the draft's talk page and, optionally, placing  on your user page. Follow the instructions in the templates' documentations.
 * Submit your article for review at Articles for Creation. This is necessary both because you are not yet an autoconfirmed user and because you have a conflict of interest with the subject of the article (because it's your own book). Other experienced users will review your submission and either allow it into mainspace (making it a full Wikipedia article) or decline it and give you suggestions on how to improve it, which you should follow.
 * After your article has made it into mainspace, any future edits to it should be done via the template due to your conflict of interest. You may also want to read Guide to effective COI edit requests to help you with these requests.
 * Please reach out to me if you have any more questions, and good luck with your article! Liu1126 (talk) 12:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from Viny123456 (04:44, 29 October 2023)
hello so i saw this video on you tube that said you can call on google plus is this true --Viny123456 (talk) 04:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, for general reference questions like these, it would be better to look it up on the relevant Wikipedia page (like Google+) or ask your question at the Reference desk, where other volunteers will help you find the information you need. Ask me questions regarding how to edit Wikipedia. Liu1126 (talk) 10:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from Damonm26 (19:57, 1 November 2023)
Hello!

I am the marketing coordinator and social media manager for a startup company. I am looking to create a Wikipedia page for our company and founder. Any suggestions? --Damonm26 (talk) 19:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Since you are employed by the company and/or person you want to create articles about, you have a conflict of interest according to the definition in Wikipedia's policies. This doesn't mean you cannot create and maintain these articles, but there are some extra steps you will need to take. Here is a brief summary of how to create an article in your situation, but you should read the official guide at Help:Your first article:
 * Make sure that the company and person you write about meets Wikipedia's general notability guidelines or the notability guidelines specific to companies and organizations and people. In short (although you should also check the linked pages above), the subject of the article should have been covered by several reliable sources.
 * Create your article in your user space or the draft space. There are several policies and guidelines you will need to follow, the most important of which are the Manual of Style, which details how the page should be structured and written, and Verifiability, which states that all claims in articles must be supported by reliable sources.
 * You should also declare your conflict of interest at this stage by using the  on the draft's talk page and, optionally, placing   on your user page. Follow the instructions in the templates' documentations.
 * Submit your article for review at Articles for Creation. This is necessary both because you are not yet an autoconfirmed user and because you have a conflict of interest with the subject of the article. Other experienced users will review your submission and either allow it into mainspace (making it a full Wikipedia article visible to all users and search engines) or decline it and give you suggestions on how to improve it, which you should follow.
 * After your article has made it into mainspace, any future edits to it should be done via the  template due to your conflict of interest. You may also want to read Guide to effective COI edit requests to help you with these requests.
 * Please reach out to me if you have any questions, and good luck with your article! Liu1126 (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Cana47 (22:31, 2 November 2023)
Hello hope you're having a good day:) --Cana47 (talk) 22:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I am, thank you! Ask me any questions you have about editing Wikipedia. Liu1126 (talk) 00:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Angelie Amboy on Google Sites (16:30, 3 November 2023)
Hello, can I ask a question? How to create an e-portfolio? --Angelie Amboy (talk) 16:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello! For general reference questions like these, it would be better to look it up on the relevant Wikipedia article (like Electronic portfolio) or ask your question at the Reference desk, where other volunteers will help you find the information you need. Ask me questions about editing Wikipedia itself. Liu1126 (talk) 20:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Lefootop (20:49, 4 November 2023)
Hello I need help with a very biased wikipedia mod that refuses to even talk to me in the talk page. May i receive help please? --Lefootop (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello. I have reviewed the situation, so I will discuss here how I believe Wikipedia's policies apply to each event, and then suggest how you should move forward. Please carefully read through the entire post.
 * As a summary: actions on both sides were debatable, the block was probably justified, there's no need for you to take any more actions as of now, please follow Dispute resolution in the future.
 * Events:
 * The other editor in the dispute makes a series of edits to the Soviet-Moroccan fishing vessel incident (1980-1981) article. Their edits mainly consist of two actions: removing the reference to this website and removing the Template:Infobox military conflict.
 * I could not find any discussions about the website on the reliable sources noticeboard, but it seems to have been widely used, and arguments for its reliability have been made (for example, at Talk:1971 Moroccan coup attempt/GA1). However, the removal of this source isn't necessarily a violation of policy. Since all the statements in which the article are also supported by the El Pais source, removing it is arguably removing redundancy without violating Verifiability.
 * The removal of the infobox is more debatable, although still not a clear violation of policy; no guideline requires infoboxes to be present, although I believe including the infobox would be useful. However, the crux of the dispute here is whether to refer to the outcome of the incident as a "victory", and here I believe the other editor may be justified in this action. The sources I can access (the El Pais source is behind a paywall) do not explicitly state that Morocco achieved a victory. Per Original research and specifically its WP:SYNTH section, editors cannot synthesise material from several sources or different parts of a single source to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated in the source itself. Therefore, the outcome cannot be stated as a Moroccan victory. For example, the Johnson South Reef Skirmish describes the result as a Chinese victory because the reference to "The Diplomat" explicitly states "These two battles saw the tactical and strategic defeat of Vietnamese forces at Chinese hands...". Meanwhile, the Hainan Island incident article does not make any statements about victory because the sources don't explicitly say who won, even though arguments could probably be made for a Chinese victory or conversely a US victory.
 * On a separate note, you used the word "tribute", which is defined as "a payment by one ruler or state to another, usually as an acknowledgment of submission". Even if the incident is considered a "victory" for Morocco, the Soviet Union is clearly not in "submission" to Morocco. Words like "reparations" or "fines" would be more appropriate.
 * You added the Soviet-Moroccan fishing vessel incident (1980-1981) article to the List of wars involving Morocco, which the other editor reverted. I believe this event is open to debate. On the one hand, the capture of a few fishing boats doesn't seem very "warlike" when compared to other conflicts typically described as wars. On the other hand, shots were fired, and since other incidents like the Perejil Island crisis have been included, an argument can be made for the inclusion of this incident as well. I will talk about how to obtain consensus on this later.
 * You left a message on the other editor's talk page, which they removed. You then re-added the message, which the other editor removed again. The two of you went back and forth with this several times. As the administrator who partially blocked you explained, per WP:BLANKING, users may freely remove messages from their own talk pages save for a few exceptions, which you message wasn't one of them. By removing the message, the other user has shown that they do not want this message on their talk page, so re-adding it was inappropriate. For this, I believe the administrator's block was justified, and as the admin said, it wouldn't be worth your time requesting an unblock.
 * Further actions you should take:
 * First of all, the other editor left the two pages in your preferred version. Therefore, this incident has effectively ended (as of now) in your favour. To quote a widely used Wikipedia essay, you should drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass.
 * If other editors, either the one you have been in dispute with or others who were previously uninvolved, restart the debate, you should go through the following steps from Dispute resolution:
 * Discuss the issue on the article talk pages. You or the other editors should start a topic on the article talk pages about the issue in dispute. You may also want to notify the other editors in the dispute using Template:Ping.
 * If no consensus can be reached, you should seek additional input.
 * If the dispute is just between you and a single other editor, you can ask for a third opinion.
 * If third opinion has failed or more than two editors are involved, you should ask for help at the relevant WikiProject. In this case, it would be WikiProject Military history. You should post a message on their talk page asking for input.
 * If the dispute is about the application of a certain policy, post a message at the relevant noticeboard. For example, if there is debate over the reliability of the Yabiladi source, post a message on the reliable sources noticeboard. If there is debate over whether using the term "victory" is original research, ask at the no original research noticeboard. There is also a general dispute resolution noticeboard for other issues.
 * If there is an issue regarding another editor's conduct, post a message at WP:ANI, where uninvolved administrators will review the situation and make a decision or recommend other courses of action.
 * I hope this helps, and good luck with your future editing! Liu1126 (talk) 23:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for your help. Lefootop (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No problem! Please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any more questions in the future. Liu1126 (talk) 14:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Onidzzukiqwq (21:12, 3 November 2023)
hello, is it possible to add a little-known virtual state with a community of 100 thousand people to Wikipedia? there are photos, a flag and the rest --Onidzzukiqwq (talk) 21:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Inclusion of content on Wikipedia is governed by the Notability guideline, specifically its general notability guideline section. To quote the summary: "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Note that different editors may have different interpretations of these guidelines, and community consensus is the ultimate arbiter in these issues.
 * If the virtual state isn't supported by enough reliable sources to warrant its own article, or the article created would probably be of stub length for the foreseeable future, you should also consider placing it as a section in one of Wikipedia's existing articles or lists. Some possible pages are Virtual world, Virtual community, Online community, and List of virtual communities. You can also look for other articles where the virtual state would fit in.
 * If you want to, you could give me some information on the virtual state, and I can help you judge whether or not it meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please reach out to me if you have any more questions. Liu1126 (talk) 13:30, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * well, then about the assessment of the situation, then this virtual state has a location in Finland near an overseas territory where people gather in every possible way thinking about creating a language, and there are also several channels in telegram with a large audience and in Twitter and reddit the same. this all already exists since 2020, does it have a place in Wikipedia? Onidzzukiqwq (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Does this virtual state have a name it is commonly known by? It sounds like that an organisation of this size and history would probably have some news articles written about it. If you could give me its name, I can do a quick source check for it. Liu1126 (talk) 17:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, no..there are only fans, communities, discord servers, virus videos in tick tok, as well as high popularity in telegram Onidzzukiqwq (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, if that's the case, I'm afraid this virtual state would not meet the notability requirements. Sources like communities, tick tok videos, telegram, etc. are considered user generated content, which is generally considered unreliable. If no other reliable sources are available, then the virtual state fails WP:GNG. You may want to consider adding this virtual state on other wiki hosting platforms like Fandom, where different content guidelines may apply. Liu1126 (talk) 11:10, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Liu1126. After reviewing your request, I have&#32;temporarily enabled rollback on your account&#32;until 2024-01-01. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 20:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only . Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
 * Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!


 * Thank you so much! Liu1126 (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from UrumiaMission (18:11, 9 November 2023)
Hi Liu1126 ... thank you for being my Wikipedia mentor, as I am a new user. I have created a page for a person and need to have the title of the page be the person's name. Apparently this has to be done through a 'move' process (the current name just has my username and the word sandbox). However, I do not see any 'move' option anywhere under the tools menu. Any words of advice you might have would be appreciated. Thank you. --UrumiaMission (talk) 18:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Moving most pages on Wikipedia require autoconfirmed rights, which means that your account needs to be at least 4 days old and have made at least 10 edits. Since you are not yet autoconfirmed, you cannot move pages yet.
 * Since you are a new editor, you cannot yet directly create articles in mainspace (where all Wikipedia articles are), both due to technical restrictions and because we would like more experienced editors to review your contributions. Instead, you will submit your article to Articles for Creation (AFC for short), where a small group of experienced editors will review your article to see if it is ready to be published. It is much easier to do this using the Article wizard, and in the future you should use this method, but since you're well on your way on this page, here is how you can proceed:
 * AFC submissions are usually in the draft namespace. If you don't mind, I can move your draft to the correct namespace for you (the new title would be Draft:John Haskell Shedd).
 * When you are ready to submit your draft, you will put the code  at the top of the page (remember to switch to source editor mode for this).
 * An experienced editor will review your draft and decide whether or not it is ready to be published. If they determine it is not ready, they will leave comments describing how you could improve the draft. You should then edit the draft to meet their comments and resubmit it for review.
 * Please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any more questions. Good luck editing! Liu1126 (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much Liu1126. Yes, please move the draft to the correct namespace with the new title, and I will follow your guidance on steps 2 and 3. Very much appreciated! UrumiaMission (talk) 18:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Done! Note that the original page User:UrumiaMission/sandbox is now a redirect to the draft page. This is an automatic procedure done for all moves. If you want to reuse the original sandbox, you can get to it by clicking on the link, and after the redirect has taken you to the target page, click on the link that appears at the top of the page with the text "(Redirected from User:UrumiaMission/sandbox)", which will take you to the redirect page. You can then remove the redirect code in the source editor. Liu1126 (talk) 19:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Nikhil.c.z (19:39, 12 November 2023)
Hello Yo what good --Nikhil.c.z (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello! Ask me any questions you have about editing Wikipedia. Liu1126 (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Slight change of sentence in a semi-protected article request
In the article of Princess Peach, in the section Character background, where it is written "Her age has never been officially confirmed, but it varies between 15 and early twenties.", would you please change 15 to mid-late teens? Thank you. 151.44.38.227 (talk) 15:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Could you explain why the change is necessary? The currently cited source states that her age was 15 in her first appearance in Super Mario Bros. Additionally, requests like these should be made on the article talk page by using an edit request or using the Edit Request Wizard. Liu1126 (talk) 16:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * To not be too specific (since that's from specifically Super Mario Bros. 1) and including a more inclusive and general age range present in the whole series and franchise as possible. I simply picked a user that could have the requirements necessary and I didn't want to open a topic in the talk page just for this, nor I think it's worth it to create an account and become an autoconfirmed user just for this. 151.44.38.227 (talk) 16:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I suppose that's reasonable. "mid-late teens" is a bit of a mouthful though, so I'll just use "mid-teens", which seems to include 15 according to most definitions. Liu1126 (talk) 16:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * But Super Mario Bros. 1 is the only game known to have a mid range, other appearances, including spin-offs and promotional material, describe her as 17 and 18, so late teens, that's why I think mid-late or mid to late is more appropriate. 151.44.38.227 (talk) 16:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Can you find some other sources about this? Liu1126 (talk) 16:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Super Mario Bros.: Peach-hime Kyūshutsu Dai Sakusen! states her age as 16 (about mid-late), the writers' bible for The Adventures of Super Mario Bros. 3 states that the DIC cartoons' version of the princess is 17, and here starts to be in late teens. 151.44.38.227 (talk) 16:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I can't access those sources. Can you give a quote from them that specifies Princess Peach's age? Also note that per WP:RSPRIMARY, secondary sources like news articles and reputable websites are preferred over primary sources if available. Liu1126 (talk) 17:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * 151.44.38.227 (talk) 18:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Seen them? 151.44.50.239 (talk) 23:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I should've been more clear in my last comment. Per the verifiability policy, all possibly debatable statements in articles must be supported by reliable, published sources. I cannot verify that the first source is actually created and published by a reputable authority on the subject. I also cannot verify whether this statement in the second source actually appears in the source, since I do not have direct access to a reliable copy of it. As a result, I would rather err on the side of caution and not include these two sources and the statements they support in the article. If you have better sources available, you can post them here. If you believe these two sources should be considered reliable, you should begin discussions to seek consensus on Talk:Princess Peach or Reliable sources/Noticeboard (although not on both at the same time, nor on the talk pages of other editors, as this is discouraged by WP:FORUMSHOP). Liu1126 (talk) 11:10, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I should've been more clear in my last comment. Per the verifiability policy, all possibly debatable statements in articles must be supported by reliable, published sources. I cannot verify that the first source is actually created and published by a reputable authority on the subject. I also cannot verify whether this statement in the second source actually appears in the source, since I do not have direct access to a reliable copy of it. As a result, I would rather err on the side of caution and not include these two sources and the statements they support in the article. If you have better sources available, you can post them here. If you believe these two sources should be considered reliable, you should begin discussions to seek consensus on Talk:Princess Peach or Reliable sources/Noticeboard (although not on both at the same time, nor on the talk pages of other editors, as this is discouraged by WP:FORUMSHOP). Liu1126 (talk) 11:10, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Play10silva on User talk:Liu1126 (14:18, 17 November 2023)
false --Play10silva (talk) 14:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I don't think I understand you. Do you have any questions about editing Wikipedia? Liu1126 (talk) 14:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Tungmatthew14 (09:33, 19 November 2023)
Hello, I am trying to create a new athlete profile for a pro junior tennis player. I'm following the Wikipedia guidelines as best as I can. Are there red flags I should be aware of or advice so that it's more likely to be published? --Tungmatthew14 (talk) 09:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! I've taken a look at the article in your sandbox, and it looks pretty good! The article has good style and is consistently citing sources, so I'm sure you're aware of WP:MOS and WP:V. One thing that I noticed is that the article doesn't have any pictures. If you can find a public domain or Creative Commons licensed image of her, you can upload it to Wikimedia Commons and add it to the article. If there are no free images of her, you can still upload a copyrighted image if it meets the criteria at WP:NFCCP. These non-free images should be uploaded directly to Wikipedia using the File upload wizard.
 * Otherwise, I think the article is ready for publication. Since you are already autoconfirmed, you are allowed to directly publish the article by moving it into mainspace. Alternatively, you can submit it to Articles for creation, where some experienced editors will review it and either publish it for you or give feedback if they think it's not ready. Good luck! Liu1126 (talk) 10:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Pessicorrections (07:52, 22 November 2023)
Hi, hope you are fine. can you please share your email or skype and whatsapp number i want to discuss a project with you. I am very thankful if you please share it with me. I want to publish this article in english it's already publish in Indonesian language. thanks Regards Zeeshan whatsapp No. +92-3074157144 zeeshanliaqat19@ gmail.com --Pessicorrections (talk) 07:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, you can email me using the "Email this user" button under the "Tools" bar at the top. However, unless there is private or non-freely licensed information concerned (which usually wouldn't be allowed in Wikipedia articles or would be better handled by an admin), I would prefer if you discussed these projects on Wikipedia, either here on my talk page or on your talk page. I would also reply to your email on your talk page instead of via email, unless you specifically object to this. Thanks. Liu1126 (talk) 10:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Adhritedit2345 on Weathering (10:48, 22 November 2023)
What do I edit --Adhritedit2345 (talk) 10:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! The short answer to your question is: almost anything! There are some actions that require advanced permissions to do, but there are loads of things you can do even as a new editor. I would suggest that you start with more basic tasks like copyediting, categorization, short descriptions, etc., before moving onto content creation. You may also find Help:Introduction and The Wikipedia Adventure useful, and there should be other suggestions on your newcomer homepage. If you get stuck with anything, feel free to ask me or other editors. Happy editing! Liu1126 (talk) 11:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Young editors
It is usually considered a bad idea to allow the age of very young editors to remain in their user pages or talk pages. I am almost sure that is mentioned in some guideline or other, but whether it is or not, there's certainly a widespread consensus on the question. JBW (talk) 12:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I missed that line in Protecting children's privacy. Thanks for redacting. Liu1126 (talk) 12:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Therizzlerofrozz (17:42, 23 November 2023)
Hi I am just confused on how the code works. --Therizzlerofrozz (talk) 17:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Wikitext (that's the jargon we use for the code) can be quite confusing at first, so you may want to begin by using the visual editor at first. If it isn't enabled by default for you, you can click on the person icon at the top right of the page, click "Preferences", go to the "Editing" tab, and in the "Editing mode" dropbox, select the option "Always give me the visual editor if possible". Alternatively, after clicking on an "edit" link, click on the pen icon at the top right of the edit box and select "Visual editing".
 * Note that visual editor is only enabled for articles, so in the future you may want to gradually familiarise yourself with raw wikitext. Help:Wikitext is a good point of reference. If you have a question about a specific piece of wikitext, you are welcome to ask me or other editors. Good luck! Liu1126 (talk) 18:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hany Adel
While I appreciate your efforts in reverting vandalism, you have restored this edit instead. I have now restored it to the last good version. Happy reverting! – 64andtim  ( talk to me! ) 15:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)


 * My bad, I thought those were the same IPs (blaming my foggy glasses this time). Thanks for correcting! Liu1126 (talk) 16:15, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Possible vandalism(?) in diplomacy articles
Good evening. I've noticed that, one or two users with the Venezuelan IP addresses of 201.242.136.223 and 201.243.34.128 have been editing diplomacy-related articles, I reverted one edit in the list of Argentine ambassadors to Peru, only to notice that it had been edited again. After doing a double-check, I noticed that the edits were incorrect, so I reversed them just now.

After doing some digging around, I noticed that you've cautioned this user on the aforementioned edits, I was wondering how this could be approached, as several of the articles are Peru-related, and as such, I've worked on most of them either completely or at least partially. For the time being, I'll undo each edit manually.

Cheers. 180app (talk) 19:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * As of now, I don't think there's enough vandalism activity to request page protection, so for the time being we'll just have to keep an eye on these pages and catch any issues as they come along. The first IP hasn't edited since the 7th and the second IP doesn't seem to be causing a lot of trouble, so a block isn't warranted right now, although if they begin vandalising the pages again you can collect a few diffs as evidence and report them to WP:AIV if the vandalism is obvious or WP:ANI if the damage is more subtle. If they start hopping between different addresses, a range block may be needed.
 * Also, I don't know if you're aware of Twinkle (I couldn't find any edits of yours using it), but it makes reverting vandalism and many other administrative tasks a lot easier. You may find it useful for keeping the disruption on these pages in check. Liu1126 (talk) 19:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * True, if anything it's a nuisance, but I would argue that, with two similar IP addresses doing this in a short period of time, this is likely to happen again, hence my question (also worth noting -- this is my first time dealing with something of this nature). In any case I'll have a look at the tool you've linked, hopefully it could save me a lot of time in the future.
 * Thanks for your help! 180app (talk) 19:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Quick note, I also noticed another Venezuelan IP, 190.205.94.218, making edits on the same date (Nov 7th). Here's to hoping it was a one time thing! 180app (talk) 23:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello again! I've noticed that again this issue has again taken place. Another Venezuelan IP, 190.36.69.119, has again vandalised a number of diplomacy-related articles. I would like to suggest the measures that were not considered the first time, as my suspicions were proven to be correct unfortunately.
 * In the meantime, I have reverted the edits on my articles. I will also finally look into your tool as I completely forgot about it last time I'm afraid. 180app (talk) 07:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yep, the situation does seem quite bad. We should definitely report this to WP:ANI. Since you've been working on this for longer than I have, I would suggest that you file the report and notify me of the discussion if you want to. You can collect a few of their most representative vandalism edits as evidence. I'll also look a bit closer at their edits when I have time later today.
 * Unfortunately, these IPs seem to be doing their work in a piecemeal, hit-and-run fashion, so it would be unlikely for admins to agree to protect the pages, as each individual page has so little vandalism, but hopefully they can at least block these few IPs, if not instituting a range block. Liu1126 (talk) 09:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * There is an issue here. Geolocating these four IP address show that they are, although all roughly in the northeastern part of Venezuela, not in the same place. I'm not too familiar with IP addresses, but I think this is quite a large discrepancy in location, which suggests that they might not be the same person. This also makes the range block harder, especially if we have to minimise collateral damage. Liu1126 (talk) 09:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Another note, I see you haven't warned these IPs after reverting their edits. These warnings can be issued by going to the IP's talk page (even if it hasn't been created yet), clicking on the "TW" bar at the top right, and selecting "Warn". A popup will appear, in which you can select the warning type and, optionally, insert the page where the issue occurred and additional comments. See WP:WARN for template info. Admins usually only block users if they have been editing past their final warning, so in this case they may be reluctant to immediately block these IPs. Liu1126 (talk) 10:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for this notice, I did report the latest IP but I haven't warned any of them. The problem is though, as you mention, these are hit-and-run type edits, and therefore I don't believe a warn is really in place as the IP changes every time (one date had two different IPs editing back-to-back) and I don't believe the person(s) behind them are really planning on reusing them. If it was a registered user, i.e. an unchangeable identifier, then it would make more sense to me, but these addresses do their edits on one day and then the next day a completely different address does the same thing. 180app (talk) 17:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree. In that case, it seems that requesting a range block at WP:ANI would be the only way forward. No one wants to be watching 50 diplomacy-related articles and spending an hour per day reverting edits on them. After starting the discussion, notify me via Twinkle's "TB" tab, and I'll chime in on what I know about the situation. Liu1126 (talk) 17:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Thisworldisntours (22:52, 13 December 2023)
Hi, what qualifies for a wikipedia page --Thisworldisntours (talk) 22:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Notability and its specialized subpolicies at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines govern what subjects deserve an independent Wikipedia article. To summarise (although you should read through these guidelines yourself), a subject is presumed to be notable if several reliable sources that are independent of each other and the subject have provided significant coverage about the subject.
 * I assume you are asking this question in relation to your recently declined AFC submission, Draft:Gavin Magnus, so I'll use this as an example to explain these guidelines to you. Since the subject of this article is a singer, his notability is governed by Notability, Notability (people), and Notability (music).
 * Of the sources included, a few of them are problematic:
 * Number 8 is his own website, so it isn't independent
 * Number 4 is Blasting News, which seems to be considered not very reliable per Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_347 and Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_228
 * Number 3 is lyrics.com, which is a wiki-like website that public members can edit, so it isn't reliable per WP:UGC
 * Of the remainder... I honestly can't find any prior discussions about them, but you should delve deeper into their editorial policies to see if they would be reliable. Generally, we err on the side of caution when seeing unfamiliar sources, so it would be better if you could use references to more well known news organisations. Hope this helps! Liu1126 (talk) 23:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks Thisworldisntours (talk) 23:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Arabinda Patra official on User:Arabinda Patra official (04:42, 15 December 2023)
How to add a photo in my Wikipedia ? --Arabinda Patra official (talk) 04:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, this depends on the license of the photo. If it is freely licensed or is in public domain, you should upload it to Wikimedia Commons. If it isn't freely licensed but you believe it falls under Wikipedia's fair use policy, you can request it to be uploaded at Files for upload. After it is uploaded, you can insert it into any page by writing  (more information at Help:Files). Hope this helps! Liu1126 (talk) 12:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

How to add photo in my Wikipedia
How to add photo in my Wikipedia Arabinda Patra official (talk) 04:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Duplicate question, see above . Liu1126 (talk) 12:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Vijay2315 on Talk:History (14:33, 15 December 2023)
I am --Vijay2315 (talk) 14:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, do you have any questions? Liu1126 (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Saw Your Post on WP:BOTREQ
Hey @Liu1126, I saw your post on WP:BOTREQ about some tasks that my bot took over. Sorry that the bot has been down for so long, I had a lot of work and personal stuff happen all at once. But I recently started it back up now that I have time to be on Wiki, if you have any questions or want to learn more feel free to reach out.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 04:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! And it's great to see you back. Liu1126 (talk) 10:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Derek021222 (15:57, 23 December 2023)
Hola, puedo crear un artículo de fútbol --Derek021222 (talk) 15:57, 23 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, I do not understand the language you have written in. Google Translate says it's Spanish, and the translation is "Hello, can I create a football article". Yes, you can! As long as the subject of the article is notable and the article is supported by reliable sources.
 * If you don't speak English, I would advise you contribute to the Spanish Wikipedia instead. You can also find help from Spanish speakers at Local Embassy.
 * Si no hablas inglés, te recomiendo que contribuyas a la Wikipedia en español. También puede encontrar ayuda de hablantes de español en Wikipedia:Embajada local#Español. (traducido por Google) Liu1126 (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from KALYKNC (05:57, 27 December 2023)
Hola soy el manager de un actor de hollywood como puedo empezar a editar su biografia --KALYKNC (talk) 05:57, 27 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello! I do not understand the language you are writing in, but Google Translate says that your question is "Hello, I am the manager of a Hollywood actor, how can I start editing his biography?" Since you are the manager of this actor, you are considered to have a conflict of interest in regards to his article. Therefore, you should not directly edit the page and instead suggest edits on the article's talk page. More information and specific instructions can be found at Conflict of interest and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.
 * If you don't speak English, I would advise you contribute to the Spanish Wikipedia instead. You can also find help from Spanish speakers at Local Embassy. Liu1126 (talk) 09:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Farrock777 (18:20, 27 December 2023)
Greetings, liu, how actually to start programm? --Farrock777 (talk) 18:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! I would recommend that you start with the newcomer tasks and structured tasks on your newcomer homepage; they should be in the lower left portion of the homepage and labelled "Suggested edits" (the homepage is probably enabled by default, but if not, you can enable it through your preferences). Other resources that you may find helpful include The Wikipedia Adventure and Contributing to Wikipedia. Good luck! Liu1126 (talk) 18:56, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Will comply.txs Farrock777 (talk) 19:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Wondered, is the translation is considered as contribution? Farrock777 (talk) 19:57, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, translations are also counted as contributions, and many articles have been created by translating articles from Wikipedias of other languages. Before you reach autoconfirmed status, you cannot directly publish articles into mainspace, so you should use the Article creation wizard to create drafts of translations or other original articles. There is also the Content translation tool, but its use is limited to extended confirmed editors. Liu1126 (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Roger, a mountain to climb Farrock777 (talk) 20:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Jglmorris (07:23, 28 December 2023)
Hello I have recently published a paper on 'The various ways in which birds blink' in the journal Animals, and I wish to update the section in Wikipedia on blinking. I would be grateful for your help in making these changes. --Jglmorris (talk) 07:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, you can edit the article yourself (unless it's protected, in which case you should submit an edit request), but if you don't feel familiar enough with Wikipedia's writing style, you can write a rough draft of what you want to add here, and I'll help you adjust it. Can you also post the DOI and (if it's online) a link to the paper? Liu1126 (talk) 11:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Officialzhwan1233 on User:Officialzhwan1233 (14:52, 28 December 2023)
How do I write a page about myself and express my music page and how do I start ? --Officialzhwan1233 (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, writing autobiographies or other pages about yourself on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged by guidelines like Autobiography and Conflict of interest. If you really think you deserve a Wikipedia article about yourself, you should follow the procedures at Articles for creation. Liu1126 (talk) 15:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from GordonBur (14:38, 28 December 2023)
How do I make addition to an existing wiki page --GordonBur (talk) 14:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, for most articles, you can click on the "edit" links at the top of the page or next to each section heading. Some articles are protected and can only be edited by certain groups of editors, in which case you should make an edit request. If you want to learn about how to make positive contributions to Wikipedia, you may find the suggested edits on your newcomer homepage and other pages like WP:HOW and WP:TWA useful. Good luck! Liu1126 (talk) 15:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you GordonBur (talk) 15:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)