User talk:Liuben

I am creating a page which somebody all the time is trying to delete, nobody knows why! I am not repeating the page, not copying the page or some other material, so you would be better of, when you first try to communicate to the people and understand what their goals are and then to try to play crazy internet police officer.

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Stefan Dimitrov with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Stefan Dimitrov with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Stefan Dimitrov saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. -- Finngall talk  21:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)


 * On the talk page of the article, you said, "I am the owner of that photo." Owning the photo does not mean that you own the copyright (unless you took the photo), and you do not address the problem of the copied article itself.  See the note above for details on how to assert that you own the copyright and are willing to license the text and photo under the GFDL. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Vandalism is what YOU DID at the page of my father - all informations were detailed and true and the photo used was my own. So, don't try to decide all over what is correct and what - not.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liuben (talk • contribs)
 * No. Vandalism is blanking another user's talk page.  Deleting an article which is copied from another web site, and for which there is not solid proof that Wikipedia has a legal right to use that material under the GFDL is just my job.  Follow the instructions above and demonstrate the you own the copyright- on the article's text as well as the picture- and you won't have any problems.  But please, don't vandalise my user page just because you don't like the copyright laws.  Wikipedia would be breaking the law if we allowed people to add material that is copyrighted. -FisherQueen (Talk) 22:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Image:Stefan Dimitrov.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Stefan Dimitrov.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Stefan Dimitrov.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Stefan Dimitrov.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -FisherQueen (Talk) 22:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Please stop to vandalizing Stefan Dimitrov. All informations there as well as the photo used are mine and I am the owner and copyright holder.

Стефан Димитров
A tag has been placed on Стефан Димитров, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

redirects to a deleted article

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --健次 (derumi)talk 23:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop uploading the image Stefan Dimitrov.jpg and the article Stefan Dimitrov
Until you provide some proof you own the copyright to the image and the text you are adding to the article, please do not re-add them again. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia by adding copyrighted material, you may be blocked from editing. Please follow the instructions above or review WP:Copyrights. Shell babelfish 07:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

August 2007
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --健次 (derumi)talk 06:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Genova & Dimitrov
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Genova & Dimitrov, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Genova & Dimitrov appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Genova & Dimitrov has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Genova & Dimitrov and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Genova & Dimitrov with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Genova & Dimitrov.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 19:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Malina DIMITROVA (1945-2008)
A tag has been placed on Malina DIMITROVA (1945-2008), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

page already exists and this is this title is not an appropriate redirect

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ukexpat (talk) 19:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Please stop re-creating this page -- there is already a Malina Dimitrova article. – ukexpat (talk) 19:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ERK talk •  contribs 19:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Malina DIMITROVA (1945-2008). ruby. red.  roses ''' 19:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Please stop vandalizing Malina DIMITROVA (1945-2008), if you wish to contest the CSD suggestion, add the template and post your reasons on the article's talk page. ERK talk •  contribs 20:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of List of opera accompanists
A tag has been placed on List of opera accompanists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  TN ‑  X   - Man  20:17, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

CSD tagging
Hi. Just a small note about removing speedy deletion tags from articles. I know you may feel that your article is being attacked, but please do not remove the notice, as that only gives users more cause to revert you and possibly ask for us to disable your editing privileges. Speedy deletion tags do not mean that an article has to be deleted; as you can see in this case, your article was approved by an administrator. Adding a hangon notice is enough for the future. If you've got any questions you're welcome to ask on my talk page. Cheers, Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! :D  21:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of List of opera accompanists
A tag has been placed on List of opera accompanists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 00:00, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of opera accompanists
I have nominated List of opera accompanists, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of opera accompanists. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D  00:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Genova & Dimitrov
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Genova & Dimitrov, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Genova & Dimitrov appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Genova & Dimitrov has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Genova & Dimitrov and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Genova & Dimitrov with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Genova & Dimitrov.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 01:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Genova & Dimitrov
A tag has been placed on Genova & Dimitrov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Scjessey (talk) 15:25, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Warning
If you post the Genova & Dimitrov page again, in spite of numerous warnings, I will block you. We do not accept copyright infringements here; we do not take the copyright infringement policy lightly; and therefore you MAY NOT copy and paste the content of other websites, even if you own them, unless they specifically state on the websites themselves that all contents are licensed to the GFDL or to public domain. This is an encyclopedia and not a free site for promotion. Thank you, Antandrus (talk) 15:26, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Genova & Dimitrov
A tag has been placed on Genova & Dimitrov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Scjessey (talk) 15:34, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked you for repeated reposting a copyright-infringing text. If you wish to be unblocked, you need to follow the instructions on the block page, and promise to stop posting promotional material, as well as stop copying and pasting from elsewhere on the web. "It isn't copyright" doesn't work as an excuse: we are an encyclopedia and you have to write content in your own words -- not take them from somewhere else. Thank you, Antandrus (talk) 15:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Liuben for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. BradV 19:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Malina Dimitrova
An article that you have been involved in editing, Malina Dimitrova, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Malina Dimitrova. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 12:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)