User talk:Livada

Mačva District
Hi! I noticed you've been removing Category:Mačva District from several pages, and I'm a bit curious why. Having the categories helps to sort the articles, but I don't want to go reverting you if there's a valid reason for the removal. Were the pages incorrectly categorized or something? -Bbik ★ 01:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I think that Mačva District category should have only municipality articles, and village articles should be in Mačva category. Problem is that Mačva district is larger than Mačva region and thus if we include villages into both categories we would make confusion whether these villages are located in region of Mačva or not. Livada
 * I don't really have the time to deal with anything around here right now, but here's my understanding of how the categorization works. For any given article, it's better to make categories as specific as possible, while also keeping them from overlapping.  It sounds like the district is entirely within the region, thereby making the district category the more specific one.  With those points in mind, I think any villages in the district/municipality should also be in that category (but not the region category), otherwise it's unclear (looking only at categories) whether they're in the district, or just the overall region.  If any of the villages previously in the category are only in the region, not also the district, they should be in the region category instead.  Does that make sense? -Bbik ★ 17:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Agreement
In article Demographic history of Bačka there has been discussion and agreement has been reached. Changing of article today is very hard job. Seeing comments of user:Hobartimus in my thinking it is possible to put your map in part of article 2001/2002 because you map is showing situation in 2002. Maybe I making mistake but putting map in begining of article will be reverted ... --Rjecina 16:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)