User talk:LiveVegan

Speedy deletion of LOBSA
A tag has been placed on LOBSA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

The speedy deletion has been contested.

LOBSA is not an individual. It is a group, somewhat similar to [](People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.) PETA is of interest because it is a social activist organisation. LOBSA is of interest because it is an activist organisation that addresses similar issues. It addresses these issues from a Buddhist perspective and also addresses them to promote Veganism withing Buddhism. For furtehr discussion, please see the LOBSA page. LiveVegan (talk) 09:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Liberation of brother and sister animals
A tag has been placed on Liberation of brother and sister animals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. This is an organisation, and can be speedy deleted, because the article indicates nothing at all that might make this particular group notable or significant or important. DGG (talk) 01:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)