User talk:Livebird

USB
The list of "portable USB devices" doesn't really belong in the USB article. We can't list every device that utilises USB, and it doesn't add anything to an article about the technical standard. -- Mark Chovain 07:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I've removed a few of the lists you've added around the place. We don't really need every product linking to every other similar product.  A back-link to List of portable software‎ might be helpful, but that's the only place these applications should be listed, else the lists will become unmaintainable. -- Mark Chovain 08:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Prayaya
I have nominated Prayaya, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Prayaya. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Mark Chovain 08:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Repost of Prayaya v3
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Prayaya v3 is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Prayaya v3 saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Elsendero (talk) 02:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Prayaya
The reason Prayaya was deleted are available its AfD discussion. The deletion was discussed, and the consensus was to delete it. For an explanation of why it is being deleted again, see WP:CSD: articles that have been deleted through the AfD process can't just be re-created. If you want to dispute the AfD decision, then you will need to go to WP:Deletion Review. -- Mark Chovain 03:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Prayaya v3
A tag has been placed on Prayaya v3, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Mark Chovain 08:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Stop_hand nuvola.svg|30px|Stop]] Stop recreating Prayaya v3. It was deleted through the AfD process.  If you keep recreating it, you will be likely be blocked from editing without any further warnings. -- Mark Chovain 08:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC)