User talk:Livefreediehard

Your edits to Portland, Maine
Welcome to Wikipedia.

Your recent edit to the page Portland, Maine appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you may do and take a look at the welcome page, if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. —BMRR (talk) 21:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fencing, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Fencing was changed by Livefreediehard (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-05-02T18:57:19+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:57, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Your edits to Muscogee County, Georgia
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Muscogee County, Georgia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —BMRR (talk) 19:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Your edits to Love (disambiguation)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Love (disambiguation). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —BMRR (talk) 19:04, 2 May 2009 (UTC)