User talk:Liverpool9898


 * }

November 2012
Hello, I'm Jaellee. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Allianz Arena because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Jaellee (talk) 21:16, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Jaellee with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:33, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Allianz Arena, you may be blocked from editing. --Jaellee (talk) 21:40, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Allianz Arena, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Jaellee (talk) 21:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits on Allianz Arena
I've been noticing that you're undoing reverts that are being made to the Allianz Arena page. They're being reverted because your changes are unsourced, so you could please stop undoing these reverts? You've already undid reverts 4 times, and that's against the 3 revert rule. I don't want to report you for this, so for everyone's sake, please stop (or at least, explain your changes at the article's talk page). Lugia2453 (talk) 21:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Allianz Arena shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:54, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Kinu  t/c 23:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)